Expositions accidentelles d’enfants aux détergents liquides en capsules : expérience du centre antipoison de Paris (2011–2012)

Villa, Antoine; Médernach, C.; Arropetian, N.; Lagrange, F.; Langrand, Jérôme; Garnier, R.

doi:10.1016/j.arcped.2014.03.018

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies listed in PubMed that were published in languages other than English were included. 31,32 Research involving animal poison centers were included, 33,34 and this was because poison centers intended for humans also receive calls involving exposures to animals. 35,36…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][28][29][30] Studies listed in PubMed that were published in languages other than English were included. 31,32 Research involving animal poison centers were included, 33,34 and this was because poison centers intended for humans also receive calls involving exposures to animals. 35,36 Case reports and small case series where any of the authors were affiliated with poison centers were excluded from the investigation.…”

Section: Case Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Bibliometric analysis of poison center-related research published in peer-review journals

Forrester

2015

Hum Exp Toxicol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Poison centers advance knowledge in the field of toxicology through publication in peer-review journals. This investigation describes the pattern of poison center-related publications. Cases were poison center-related research published in peer-review journals during 1995–2014. These were identified through searching the PubMed database, reviewing the tables of contents of selected toxicology journals, and reviewing abstracts of various national and international meetings. The following variables for each publication were identified: year of publication, journal, type of publication (meeting abstract vs. other, i.e. full article or letter to the editor), and the country(ies) of the poison center(s) included in the research. Of the 3147 total publications, 62.1% were meeting abstracts. There were 263 publications in 1995–1999, 536 in 2000–2004, 999 in 2005–2009, and 1349 in 2010–2014. The publications were in 234 different journals. The journals in which the highest number of research was published were Clinical Toxicology (69.7%), Journal of Medical Toxicology (2.2%), and Veterinary and Human Toxicology (2.1%). The research was reported from 62 different countries. The countries with the highest number of publications were the United States (67.9%), United Kingdom (6.5%), Germany (3.9%), France (2.5%), and Italy (2.4%). The number of publications increased greatly over the 20 years. Although the publications were in a large number of journals, a high proportion of the publications were in one journal. While the research came from a large number of countries, the preponderance came from the United States.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Case Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric analysis of poison center-related research published in peer-review journals

Forrester

2015

Hum Exp Toxicol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Con respecto a los sínto-mas, 364 (80%) de los pacientes expuestos a detergentes tipo "pod" presentaron síntomas y el 20% fueron asintomáticos, mientras que en los casos de población expuesta a otro tipo de detergentes el 63% fueron sintomáticos y un 37% asintomáti-cos. Con respecto a los signos y síntomas más reportados en la literatura sobre el tema, el vómito fue uno de los síntomas más frecuentes ("pods": 55%, "no-pods": 34%), seguido de tos ("pods":15%, "no-pods": 11%), disfagia ("pods":11%, "no-pods": 16%), ojo rojo/ conjuntivitis ("pods": 8%, "no-pods": 9%), mareo y letargia ("pod":7%, "no-pods": 2%) y náuseas ("pods": 6%, "nopods": 4%). (14,15,16,17) Uno de los mecanismos fisiopatológicos que explican el riesgo de los detergentes tipo "pod" es que en estos se reemplaza el propilenglicol con el 1,4-butanodiol, el cual es responsable de las manifestaciones sedantes en los niños. Sin embargo, al analizar los principales detergentes tipo "pod" del mercado, este compuesto no fue encontrado.…”

Section: Detergentes "Pod" Y Sus Riesgosunclassified

Intoxicaciones por detergentes tipo “pod”: un nuevo riesgo a considerar

García¹,

Mejía²

2017

Pediatr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aceptado el 18 de julio de 2017 Palabras clave:Intoxicaciones en pediatría detergentes tipo "pod" riesgos. R E S U M E NLas intoxicaciones son una causa frecuente de consulta a los servicios de urgencias. En Colombia, el Sistema Nacional de Vigilancia en Salud Pública (SIVIGILA) ha reportado su aumento. Hasta la semana epidemiológica 41 del año 2016, se habían reportado 27,117 casos de intoxicación, con una ocurrencia de 55.6 por cada 100.000 habitantes, en su mayoría por medicamentos.La población pediátrica está expuesta a diversos xenobióticos por sus actividades exploratorias, entre los cuales se cuentan los productos de limpieza. Los detergentes tipo "pod" (detergentes encapsulados) han ganado popularidad en nuestro país; uno de los riesgos que presenta esta clase de detergentes es su empaque, el cual guarda similitud con la apariencia de un dulce, lo cual lo hace atractivo a los niños, aumentando el riesgo de exposiciones accidentales.Tradicionalmente se ha considerado que los productos de limpieza tienen bajo potencial de letalidad, sin embargo, hay nueva evidencia que demuestra que las intoxicaciones por detergentes generan riesgos gastrointestinales, neurológicos, metabólicos, respiratorios y renales, por lo cual es importante cambiar el paradigma de que los detergentes no tienen una toxicidad importante.

show abstract

“…Poisonings, eye injuries and skin irritation caused by detergent packet-related exposures have been reported in Europe (Day et al 2019b ; Villa et al 2014 ; Settimi et al 2018 ). Shortly after detergent packets were introduced into North America, there were reports of related poisonings and injuries among children (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2012 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pediatric injuries and poisonings associated with detergent packets: results from the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP), 2011–2023

Zutrauen,

Cheesman,

McFaull

2024

Inj. Epidemiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Detergent packets are common household products; however, they pose a risk of injuries and poisonings, especially among children. This study examined the epidemiological characteristics of pediatric injuries and poisonings related to all types of detergent packets in Canada using emergency department (ED) data from the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP) database. Methods The CHIRPP database was searched for ED visit records for injuries and poisonings related to all types of detergent packets between April 1, 2011 and October 12, 2023 (N = 2,021,814) using variable codes and narratives. Data for individuals aged 17 years and younger were analyzed descriptively. Temporal trends in the number of detergent packet-related injuries and poisonings per 100,000 CHIRPP cases were assessed using Joinpoint regression and annual percent change (APC). A proportion ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to compare the proportion of detergent packet-related cases in CHIRPP during two 34-months periods, pre-COVID-19 pandemic and after the beginning of the pandemic. Results There were 904 detergent packet-related cases among children and youth aged 17 years and younger identified in CHIRPP between April 1, 2011 and October 12, 2023, representing 59.9 cases per 100,000 CHIRPP cases. The majority (86.5%) of cases were among children aged 4 years and younger. Poisonings (58.8%) and eye injuries (30.6%) were the most frequent primary diagnoses. Unintentional ingestion (56.9%) and squeezing/breaking a detergent packet (32.3%) were the most frequent exposure mechanisms. Sixty-five patients (7.2%) were admitted to hospital. The number of detergent packet-related cases per 100,000 CHIRPP cases increased by 5.0% (95% CI 0.8, 10.2) annually between 2012 and 2022. The number of detergent packet-related poisonings per 100,000 CHIRPP cases decreased by 15.3% (95% CI − 22.3, − 10.6) annually between 2015 and 2022, whereas eye injuries showed an average annual percent increase of 16.6% (95% CI 11.2, 23.0) between 2012 and 2022. The proportion of detergent packet-related cases in CHIRPP after the beginning of the pandemic (79.9/100,000 CHIRPP cases) was 1.43 (95% CI 1.20, 1.71) times greater than pre-pandemic (55.7/100,000 CHIRPP cases). Conclusions Detergent packet-related injuries and poisonings are a persisting issue. Continued surveillance and prevention efforts are needed to reduce detergent packet-related injuries and poisonings in Canada, particularly among children and youth.

show abstract

Expositions accidentelles d’enfants aux détergents liquides en capsules : expérience du centre antipoison de Paris (2011–2012)

Cited by 4 publications

References 18 publications

Bibliometric analysis of poison center-related research published in peer-review journals

Bibliometric analysis of poison center-related research published in peer-review journals

Intoxicaciones por detergentes tipo “pod”: un nuevo riesgo a considerar

Pediatric injuries and poisonings associated with detergent packets: results from the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP), 2011–2023

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About