2004
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure assessment for a population-based case-control study combining a job-exposure matrix with interview data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Parents in the present study provided a job title, but no information regarding chemical exposure, control measures or the tasks performed at work. The study coded the job titles and constructed a JEM to the main classes of known occupational asthmogens [22] using previous experience in other population-based occupational/ health studies [18]. With all JEMs, there is misclassification of exposure because of variability in the intensity of exposure within jobs [23], and the present classification methods are likely to be similarly limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Parents in the present study provided a job title, but no information regarding chemical exposure, control measures or the tasks performed at work. The study coded the job titles and constructed a JEM to the main classes of known occupational asthmogens [22] using previous experience in other population-based occupational/ health studies [18]. With all JEMs, there is misclassification of exposure because of variability in the intensity of exposure within jobs [23], and the present classification methods are likely to be similarly limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each of the 353 SOC2000 codes, two experienced occupational hygienists with experience of retrospective exposure assessment [18] independently derived semi-quantitative ratings (high, medium, low and zero) for the intensity of workplace and take-home exposure to 11 major occupational sensitisers (wood, diisocyanate, flour, glues/ resins, animals, solder, enzymes, biocides/fungicides, foods, natural rubber latex and dyes). Assessment of the intensity of workplace exposure was based on typical UK working conditions during the early 1990s and took account of control measures, personal protective equipment and ventilation/ extraction methods in common use within that sector.…”
Section: Parental Occupationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study the mass transfer of soil-sorbed hydrophobic pesticides from the soil phase to the solution phase was achieved by introducing a bacterial population capable of solubilizing the pesticide through biosurfactant production that subsequently degrades the pesticide. There are many reports on the enhanced bioavailability of organic contaminants with low water solubility by using biosurfactants and biosurfactant producing microbes (Paria, 2008;Preethy and Nilanjana, 2010;Jing et al, 2010), but there are few studies on the enhanced bioavailability of pesticides in water and soil by adding a biosurfactant externally (Natesan et al, 2012;Semple et al, 2004;Mata-Sandoval et al, 2000;Arunkumar et al, 2011;Kosaric, 2001;Wattanaphon and Kerdsin, 2008). Natesan et al (2012) reported 30e50% enhanced degradation of freshly spiked HCH isomers (200 mg/g) Sphingomonas sp.…”
Section: Biodegradation Of Endosulfan and Other Pesticides In Differementioning
confidence: 96%
“…To assess the relationship between occupational exposure and risk of lung damage an occupational hygienist created a job exposure matrix [15] using Standard Occupational Classifications 2000, generated using the computer assisted structured coding tool [16] system. Job codes were divided into three groups according to the likelihood and probable intensity of exposure to agents known to cause occupational lung disease.…”
Section: Clinical Phenotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%