2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.09.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure assessment of particulates of diesel and natural gas fuelled buses in silico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…UFP percentage contribution was about 75% and confirms previous measurements, performed in a street canyon in downtown Rome, in which their percentage ranged between 70%–95% [49,50]; studies performed in other urban environments, in cities other than Rome, reported a percentage contribution of particles below 100 nm of about 80% of the total particle number concentration [51,52,53,54,55]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…UFP percentage contribution was about 75% and confirms previous measurements, performed in a street canyon in downtown Rome, in which their percentage ranged between 70%–95% [49,50]; studies performed in other urban environments, in cities other than Rome, reported a percentage contribution of particles below 100 nm of about 80% of the total particle number concentration [51,52,53,54,55]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The simulations focused on the computation of NO X emissions since the main problem in FL air quality-wise is associated to the high levels of NO 2 (Borge et al, 2014). However, PM 10 emission computation was also addressed due to their harmful effects to human health (Pietikäinen et al, 2009;Ristovski et al, 2012).…”
Section: Modelling Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among different particle dosimetry models (ICRP, 1994;Voutilainen et al, 2004;Pietik€ ainen et al, 2009;Manigrasso and Avino, 2012;Avino et al, 2013;Manigrasso et al, 2013) and pulmonary morphometric models (Yeh et al, 1979;Yeh and Schum, 1980;Raabe et al, 1976;Koblinger and Hofmann, 1985;Asgharian et al, 2001) present in literature, the Multiple-Path Particle Dosimetry (MPPD v2.1, ARA 2009) model has been considered in the present paper. MPPD model has been developed by the Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences and the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) (Asgharian et al, 2001), it is able to estimate the dose received by people as a function of the size and the airway generation number.…”
Section: Dose Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%