2000
DOI: 10.1136/tc.9.2.163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure to cigarette promotions and smoking uptake in adolescents: evidence of a dose-response relation

Abstract: Objective-To assess whether a doseresponse relation exists between the number of cigarette promotional items (CPIs) owned by an adolescent, and smoking behaviour. Design and setting-Voluntary, self administered survey of 1265 sixth through to 12th grade students (ages 10-19 years), representing 79-95% of all students attending five rural New Hampshire and Vermont public (state funded) schools in October 1996. The association between the number of CPIs owned by students and smoking behaviour was examined using … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…35,36 In addition, more than 20 studies have found that children exposed to cigarette ads or promotions are more likely to become smokers themselves. 37,38 Recent evidence has emerged that tobacco companies have specifically targeted teenagers as young as 13 years of age. 39 Alcohol Advertising Alcohol manufacturers spend $5.7 billion/year on advertising and promotion.…”
Section: Tobacco Advertisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35,36 In addition, more than 20 studies have found that children exposed to cigarette ads or promotions are more likely to become smokers themselves. 37,38 Recent evidence has emerged that tobacco companies have specifically targeted teenagers as young as 13 years of age. 39 Alcohol Advertising Alcohol manufacturers spend $5.7 billion/year on advertising and promotion.…”
Section: Tobacco Advertisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39,[42][43][44] It has also been shown that there is a dose-response relation at community level between the volume of tobacco promotional activities and the probability of experimental and established smoking. 45 Based on knowledge of youth attitudes to smoking, the tobacco companies constantly develop more effective ways of selling tobacco products to young people. 33,46 There are also different opinions regarding the effectiveness of pricing policy among youth.…”
Section: Smoking Patterns In Candidate Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of cancer mortality for the year 2000 for all 10 accession countries were derived from the Globocan 2000 software and database. 13 Age-standardized mortality rates (ASRs) were calculated for all ages combined and for age groups [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74] Hungary and Poland) and for age groups 20 -44, 45-64 and 65 and over (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia and Slovenia) for each sex separately. The World Standard Population was used for age adjustment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The link between tobacco industry advertising and youth smoking is also well established (Evans et al, 1995;Pierce et al, 1991). In fact, there is a dose-response relationship between the number of cigarette promotional items owned by adolescents and their smoking behavior (Sargent et al, 2000). Among young adults, tobacco use is positively associated with participation in social activities, whereas religion, educational achievement, and athletic participation have protective effects (Rigotti et al, 2000).…”
Section: Psychologicalmentioning
confidence: 99%