<p><b>Help-seeking for mental health concerns, and the barriers that individuals encounter that prevent them from help-seeking, are particularly important to address within the military. Among other reasons, untreated mental health concerns have been associated with increased homelessness, alcohol abuse, and relationship breakdowns (Dandeker, et al., 2003; As cited in Walker, 2010). Within the New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) context, barriers to help-seeking have been associated with experiencing greater psychological distress (Hom, et al., 2020). One specific form of distress that has the potential to impact the overall well-being of NZDF personnel is moral injury - the harm that occurs to individuals when an event occurs that conflicts with that individual’s personal beliefs or morals (MacDonald, et al., 2018). </b></p>
<p>The purpose of this research is to identify the impact of moral injury on NZDF personnel, and specifically how it impacts help-seeking behaviours. The role of guilt and shame was examined as the driving force behind this relationship. A survey of 4092 NZDF personnel was examined, 1947 of whom had been deployed. Of the deployed individuals, 23.6% had reported exposure to a potentially morally injurious event (PMIE), and 18.2% had experienced guilt or shame over an event whilst on deployment. Counter to expectations, there was no significant relationship found between PMIEs and future help-seeking intentions, nor did guilt mediate the relationship between PMIEs and help-seeking. However, concerns regarding the impact that help-seeking would have on one’s career (professional concerns) functioned as a suppressor variable and, once included, accounted for 36.2% of the relationship between PMIEs and help-seeking. Further, emotions of guilt and shame were found to account for 49.2% of the variance in PMIEs and the barrier of professional concerns. These findings suggest that the role that guilt and shame have on the relationship between PMIEs and help-seeking occurs indirectly, through the relationship between PMIEs and career concerns. </p>
<p>The role of guilt and shame was complex, and included associations with help-seeking - for individuals who held professional concerns, help-seeking decreased. However, for individuals who held less professional concerns, help-seeking increased. Guilt and shame also protected against the relationship between PMIEs with distress and mental health concerns in a moderation, and enhanced relationship warmth for individuals who had experienced a PMIE. This suggests that experiencing guilt and shame whilst on deployment may also have positive implications on an individual’s overall well-being, as opposed to a purely negative impact. The protective aspect of guilt and shame should be further explored within soldiers' pre-deployment training, so they are better prepared for the possibility of experiencing these adverse emotions, and to explain how both guilt and shame can serve a beneficial purpose.</p>