2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16623-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure to Magnetic Field Non-Ionizing Radiation and the Risk of Miscarriage: A Prospective Cohort Study

Abstract: Magnetic field (MF) non-ionizing radiation is widespread and everyone is exposed to some degree. This prospective cohort study of 913 pregnant women examined the association between high MF exposure and miscarriage risk. Cox (proportional hazards) regression was used to examine the association. After controlling for multiple other factors, women who were exposed to higher MF levels had 2.72 times the risk of miscarriage (hazard ratio = 2.72, 95% CI: 1.42–5.19) than those with lower MF exposure. The increased r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Once a pregnant woman had given consent to participate in the study, she was asked to wear an EMDEX meter (Enertech Inc) 9,10,19,20 to capture the level of MF nonionizing radiation exposure.…”
Section: Measuring Levels Of Exposure To Mf Nonionizing Radiation Durmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once a pregnant woman had given consent to participate in the study, she was asked to wear an EMDEX meter (Enertech Inc) 9,10,19,20 to capture the level of MF nonionizing radiation exposure.…”
Section: Measuring Levels Of Exposure To Mf Nonionizing Radiation Durmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important strengths of the study is the use of EMDEX Lite, which objectively showed the MF exposure level from various sources [ 55 ]. Another study demonstrated that pregnant women who were exposed to higher MF levels had 2.72× the risk of miscarriage than those with lower MF exposure [ 27 ], so that the peak MF exposure with risk ratios of 1.8 (with a threshold of approximately 16 mG) as measured by personal monitoring in early pregnancy may be associated with miscarriage risk [ 32 ]. These findings are consistent with previous studies examining the association between high MF exposure and miscarriage risk [ 29 , 30 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reproductive characteristics also considered were previous pregnancy, day 3 FSH levels (IUI/L), initial infertility diagnosis (female factor, male factor, or unexplained), previous intrauterine insemination (IUI) (yes/no), previous IVF (yes/ no), IVF cycle (yes/no), treatment protocol (antagonist, flare, or luteal-phase agonist), E 2 trigger levels (pmol/L), endometrial thickness mm, ICSI (yes/no), and measurement-day nausea (yes/no). Final covariates were included if they were associated with exposure in our cohort, associated with exposure based on previous studies, and known to be a predictor of IVF outcomes (11,13,22). Final models were adjusted for age, BMI, race (white/other), endometrial thickness, IVF (yes/no), and number of changes in environment per day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%