2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure to multiple accents supports infants’ understanding of novel accents

Abstract: Accented speech poses a challenge for listeners, particularly those with limited knowledge of their language. In a series of studies, we explored the possibility that experience with variability, specifically the variability provided by multiple accents, would facilitate infants' comprehension of speech produced with an unfamiliar accent. 15- and 18-month-old American-English learning infants were exposed to brief passages of multi-talker speech and subsequently tested on their ability to distinguish between r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefit of experience with regional accents in our study, however, suggests that variability in the input may lead to a more flexible mapping of accented word forms onto stored representations. This is in line with some previous studies suggesting that exposure to multiple accents benefits understanding of novel accents (Baese-Berk et al, 2013;Clopper, 2014), and that this benefit is already present in infancy (Potter & Saffran, 2017). Lexical representations in children with more accent experience might not be as fixed as in children with less accent experience.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The benefit of experience with regional accents in our study, however, suggests that variability in the input may lead to a more flexible mapping of accented word forms onto stored representations. This is in line with some previous studies suggesting that exposure to multiple accents benefits understanding of novel accents (Baese-Berk et al, 2013;Clopper, 2014), and that this benefit is already present in infancy (Potter & Saffran, 2017). Lexical representations in children with more accent experience might not be as fixed as in children with less accent experience.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For a given period of time children whose input consists of many different accents would have greater experience with phonological variation than those exposed to one single accent. Potter and Saffran (2017) have shown that young children's recognition of unfamiliarly accented words benefits from short-term exposure to multiple varieties as compared to only two varieties. We did not include the number of accents children were exposed to in our measure of accent experience because most of the children were exposed to one regional accent (Swabian in all cases but three) in addition to Standard German.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the results of our study indicate only a very subtle effect of Spanish language experience on children’s processing of Spanish-accented English. This finding is rather surprising in light of the findings yielded by studies that have tested comprehension of accented speech following short-term accent exposure (Bradlow & Bent, 2008; Clarke & Garrett, 2004; Potter & Saffran, 2017; Schmale, Crista, & Seidl, 2012). These studies show rapid adaption to accented speech comprehension, with participants improving in their processing of accented speech with very little exposure to it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Other studies have suggested that pre-exposure to multiple different accents can also, in some circumstances, facilitate adaptation. For example, in a recent listening preference study, Potter and Saffran (2017) demonstrated that 18-month-olds, but not 15-month-olds, were able to recognize known words in a novel, unfamiliar accent (British English) after exposure to a mixture of different unfamiliar accents (but note that pre-exposure to British English on its own was not sufficient to elicit recognition).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%