Exposure to news grows less fragmented with an increase in mobile access

Abstract

The abundance of media options is a central feature of today’s information environment. Many accounts, often based on analysis of desktop-only news use, suggest that this increased choice leads to audience fragmentation, ideological segregation, and echo chambers with no cross-cutting exposure. Contrary to many of those claims, this paper uses observational multiplatform data capturing both desktop and mobile use to demonstrate that coexposure to diverse news is on the rise, and that ideological self-selection does not explain most of that coexposure. We show that mainstream media outlets offer the common ground where ideologically diverse audiences converge online, though our analysis also reveals that more than half of the US online population consumes no online news, underlining the risk of increased information inequality driven by self-selection along lines of interest. For this study, we use an unprecedented combination of observed data from the United States comprising a 5-y time window and involving tens of thousands of panelists. Our dataset traces news consumption across different devices and unveils important differences in news diets when multiplatform or desktop-only access is used. We discuss the implications of our findings for how we think about the current communication environment, exposure to news, and ongoing attempts to limit the effects of misinformation.

The Role of Suspended Accounts in Political Discussion on Social Media: Analysis of the 2017 French, UK and German Elections

“…While social media use may broadly be associated with more diverse news diets Yang et al, 2020) and higher levels of political participation, engagement, and expression (Boulianne, 2019), they are also associated with a range of problems, including attempts to artificially shape the public agenda (Vargo et al, 2018), spread disinformation (Grinberg et al, 2019), or inflate the popularity of specific candidates (Allcott & Gentzkow, 2017). Social media activities may also contribute to the polarization of political debates and stoke incivility in the public sphere (Stella et al, 2018;Theocharis et al, 2016).…”

Audience Views on Professional Norms of Journalism. A Media Repertoire Approach

“…This would lead to a better depiction of media consumption patterns in comparison to filling out an (online) survey (Möller et al 2019in Geers 2020. Another upheaval when questioning news consumption could be that a large number of people access news outlets, not only to consume hard news but mostly for entertainment purposes (Yang et al 2020). Hence, taking up preferred news topics would compose a more detailed news repertoire.…”

Online News in India: Appraising the Digital News Consumption Landscape in the World’s Largest Democracy (2014-2018)

“…This has led to research endeavours driven by methodological innovations in the area of network science that have analyzed behavioral trace data to address many of the debates that had characterized the early literature on online news. One such line of research has shown how online consumption is really not "decentralized" as many early internet evangelists had speculated (Mukerjee, Majó-Vázquez, & González-Bailón, 2018), even though it is more diverse (Yang, Majó-Vázquez, Nielsen, & González-Bailón, 2020).…”