2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure to noise and air pollution by mode of transportation during rush hours in Montreal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
35
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to compare the mean noise levels recorded here-68.4, 70.7, and 73.4 dB(A) in Copenhagen, Montreal, and Paris, respectively-to those found in other European and North American cities: from 63 to 65 dB(A) in eleven Dutch cities [28], 70 in Rotterdam, 73 in Helsinki, 75 in Thessaloniki [29], and 70.5 and 68.8 in Montreal [25,26].…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is interesting to compare the mean noise levels recorded here-68.4, 70.7, and 73.4 dB(A) in Copenhagen, Montreal, and Paris, respectively-to those found in other European and North American cities: from 63 to 65 dB(A) in eleven Dutch cities [28], 70 in Rotterdam, 73 in Helsinki, 75 in Thessaloniki [29], and 70.5 and 68.8 in Montreal [25,26].…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…8, 66.8, and 74.0 dB(A), respectively). Even rarer are the urban studies that examine the variations of cyclists exposure to road traffic noise according to characteristics of the route taken by the cyclists [26,28,32]. The present work falls within this stream of studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…No O 3 sensor was available during this data collection, but we propose another approach based on statistical methods to control its contribution to the measurements (see Sections 3.3 and 5.1). Aeroqual Series 500 monitors have largely been used in numerous studies on individual exposure or air pollution mapping, e.g., [11,19,[61][62][63].…”
Section: Primary Data Collection and Structurationmentioning
confidence: 99%