2016
DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agw020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure to Online Alcohol Marketing and Adolescents’ Drinking: A Cross-sectional Study in Four European Countries

Abstract: Youngsters in the four European countries report frequent exposure to online alcohol marketing. The association between this exposure and adolescents' drinking was robust and seems consistent across national contexts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, 57% ( n  = 20) of the studies originated in the USA (Workman, 2003; Stacy et al ., 2004; Zogg, 2004; Ellickson et al ., 2005; McClure et al ., 2006; Saffer and Dave, 2006; Collins et al ., 2007; Fisher et al ., 2007; Paschall et al ., 2007; Dumsha, 2008; Grenard, 2008; Henriksen et al ., 2008; Truong, 2008; McClure et al ., 2009; Pasch et al ., 2009; Tobler, 2009; Tobler et al ., 2009; Truong and Sturm, 2009; Chen et al ., 2010; Dumsha, 2011; Reboussin et al ., 2011; Shamblen et al ., 2011; Stanley et al ., 2011; Tobler et al ., 2011; Stoolmiller et al ., 2012; Grenard et al ., 2013; Lo et al ., 2013a, b; McClure et al ., 2013; Rowland et al ., 2014), 6% ( n  = 2) from the UK (Gordon et al ., 2010a, b; Gordon, 2011; Young et al ., 2013), 9% ( n  = 3) from Australia (Jones and Magee, 2011; Rowland et al ., 2014; Azar et al ., 2016), 6% ( n  = 2) from New Zealand (Huckle et al ., 2008; Lin et al ., 2012) and one study from Denmark (Bendtsen et al ., 2013), Brazil (Faria et al ., 2011), Switzerland (Kuntsche et al ., 2008), Zambia (Swahn et al ., 2011), the Philippines (Swahn et al ., 2013) and the Netherlands (van Hoof et al ., 2008). Two further studies (6%) spanned several European countries, with data collected in Germany, Italy, Scotland, the Netherlands and Poland (de Bruijn et al ., 2012; Anderson et al ., 2012; Morgenstern et al ., 2014; de Bruijn et al ., 2016a, b). The majority of studies focused exclusively on alcohol promotion ( n  = 14, 40%) or its placement in retail outlets ( n  = 13, 37%), with a much smaller number examining price ( n  = 1) or the development, launch or branding of alcohol products ( n  = 1) only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 57% ( n  = 20) of the studies originated in the USA (Workman, 2003; Stacy et al ., 2004; Zogg, 2004; Ellickson et al ., 2005; McClure et al ., 2006; Saffer and Dave, 2006; Collins et al ., 2007; Fisher et al ., 2007; Paschall et al ., 2007; Dumsha, 2008; Grenard, 2008; Henriksen et al ., 2008; Truong, 2008; McClure et al ., 2009; Pasch et al ., 2009; Tobler, 2009; Tobler et al ., 2009; Truong and Sturm, 2009; Chen et al ., 2010; Dumsha, 2011; Reboussin et al ., 2011; Shamblen et al ., 2011; Stanley et al ., 2011; Tobler et al ., 2011; Stoolmiller et al ., 2012; Grenard et al ., 2013; Lo et al ., 2013a, b; McClure et al ., 2013; Rowland et al ., 2014), 6% ( n  = 2) from the UK (Gordon et al ., 2010a, b; Gordon, 2011; Young et al ., 2013), 9% ( n  = 3) from Australia (Jones and Magee, 2011; Rowland et al ., 2014; Azar et al ., 2016), 6% ( n  = 2) from New Zealand (Huckle et al ., 2008; Lin et al ., 2012) and one study from Denmark (Bendtsen et al ., 2013), Brazil (Faria et al ., 2011), Switzerland (Kuntsche et al ., 2008), Zambia (Swahn et al ., 2011), the Philippines (Swahn et al ., 2013) and the Netherlands (van Hoof et al ., 2008). Two further studies (6%) spanned several European countries, with data collected in Germany, Italy, Scotland, the Netherlands and Poland (de Bruijn et al ., 2012; Anderson et al ., 2012; Morgenstern et al ., 2014; de Bruijn et al ., 2016a, b). The majority of studies focused exclusively on alcohol promotion ( n  = 14, 40%) or its placement in retail outlets ( n  = 13, 37%), with a much smaller number examining price ( n  = 1) or the development, launch or branding of alcohol products ( n  = 1) only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the alcohol industry went from spending $2 billion on social media in 2008 to $3.5 billion in 2013, which reflects changes in the way young people view and access information [53]. Recently, the European Centre for Alcohol Marketing (EUCAM) estimated that online advertising resulting from a recent deal between Google and Heineken has the ability to reach 103 million minors monthly [54]. Thus, examining whether these shifts equate to actual changes in drinking behaviors is important.…”
Section: Traditional and Digital Exposure Venuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the association between the latent growth classes and the distal outcome, the high stable class exhibited the highest probability of drinking alcohol at grade eight, followed by the high quadratic class, then the moderate stable class, and lastly, the low stable class. These results are in line with social cognitive theory's assertion that continuous online exposure to alcohol‐related stimuli, cues, and reinforcement (e.g., alcohol marketer‐generated content, alcohol‐related content displayed by peers, peer alcohol associations) predisposes adolescents to pro‐alcohol attitudes, beliefs, and norms and is likely to increase risk of underage drinking (Bandura, ; de Bruijn et al ., ; Gordon, ; Huang et al ., ; McClure et al ., ). In the light of the limited research on the effect of general Internet usage on underage drinking, the present findings show suggestive evidence that youth who spend more time on the Internet have greater chances of receiving pro‐drinking messages, of affiliating with alcohol‐promoting peers, and of developing positive attitudes towards alcohol, which in turn increase their likelihood of starting to drink (Chiao et al ., ; Gámez‐Guadix et al ., ; Huang et al ., ; Sun et al ., , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%