Exposure to Parenting by Lying in Childhood: Associations with Negative Outcomes in Adulthood

Santos, Rachel; Zanette, Sarah; Kwok, Shiu Man; Heyman, Gail D.; Lee, Kang

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01240

Cited by 26 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Recent research suggests that parental lying may have implications for children’s mental health (Heyman et al, 2013; Santos et al, 2017; Setoh et al, 2020). For example, Setoh et al (2020) examined young adults in Singapore and found that reports of high levels of childhood exposure to self-oriented lying from parents predicted higher levels of externalizing problems, internalizing problems, and psychopathic attributes in adulthood.…”

Section: Parental Lying Behaviorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Parents with greater religiosity lie less to their children.

Setoh¹,

Santos²,

Zhao³

et al. 2022

Psychology of Religion and Spirituality

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Parental Lying Behaviorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Parents with greater religiosity lie less to their children.

Setoh¹,

Santos²,

Zhao³

et al. 2022

Psychology of Religion and Spirituality

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moreover, the effects of parents' lies to gain their children's compliance appear to be enduring. Adults who reported that their parents lied to them to solicit desired behaviours in childhood also reported lying to their parents in adulthood, and the more they experienced parenting by lying, the more they lied (Santos, Zanette, Kwok, Heyman, & Lee, 2017; Setoh, Zhao, Santos, Heyman, & Lee, 2020). Parenting by lying may lead to increased lie‐telling because it hinders value internalization.…”

Section: The Domains‐of‐socialization Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding the development of honesty in children through the domains‐of‐socialization approach

Tong

Talwar

2021

Infant and Child Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Honesty is an important value that children acquire through socialization. To date, the socialization process by which children learn to behave honestly remains relatively unexamined.Researchers may have left this area of research relatively unexamined because there is no framework to understand how parents socialize honesty and lie-telling in their children.As such, we suggest that the domains-of-socialization approach, which organizes the socialization process into various domains based on different aspects of the caregiver-child relationship, may provide such a framework. Using this framework, researchers can operationalize vague parenting variables and identify gaps in the research, allowing them to investigate the relationship between socialization and developmental trajectories of honesty and lie-telling tendencies more thoroughly. In this paper, we review the literature on factors influencing children's lie-telling and honesty in relation to the five domains to demonstrate the applicability of the domainsof-socialization framework to research on the socialization of honesty. We also provide recommendations for future research on the socialization of honesty using a domainspecific approach, which will contribute to our understanding of how children develop into normative or problematic liars.

show abstract

“…In fact, most recent studies argue that the condition necessary to clearly demonstrate and justify the presence of a mediating effect between two variables of interest, is to confirm the significance of an indirect effect between the two, regardless of the presence of “an effect to be mediated” ( Hayes, 2009 , 2013 ; Preacher et al, 2007 ; Zhao et al, 2010 ). This approach has been gaining increasing popularity in the organizational and psychology literature (e.g., Mostafa & Bottomley, 2018 ; Romani, Grappi, & Bagozzi, 2013 ; Santos, Zanette, Kwok, Heyman, & Lee, 2017 ) as it allows for more rigorous testing of mediating effects.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying with How We Are, Fitting with What We Do: Personality and Dangerousness at Work as Moderators of Identification and Person–Organization Fit Effects

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using a sample drawn from a Brazilian electric company exposing employees to both dangerous and non-dangerous working conditions, the current study provides evidence on the differential underlying mechanisms guiding the relationships of organizational identification and person-organization-fit (P-O fit) with job performance. We suggest that despite their relatedness in current literature, organizational identification operates as a largely self-centered process and P-O fit as a predominantly context-dependent one, leading to distinct workrelated processes deriving from each construct. Our findings suggest that P-O fit serves as a pathway through which job identification induces job performance. In this mediating path, personality and in particular neuroticism, hinders the effects of identification, whereas job dangerousness, a contextual factor, undermines work-related effects of perceived environmental congruence (P-O fit). Discussing these results, we provide novel insights on the distinct mechanisms driving organizational identification, P-O fit and their contingencies.

show abstract

Exposure to Parenting by Lying in Childhood: Associations with Negative Outcomes in Adulthood

Cited by 26 publications

References 28 publications

Parents with greater religiosity lie less to their children.

Parents with greater religiosity lie less to their children.

Understanding the development of honesty in children through the domains‐of‐socialization approach

Identifying with How We Are, Fitting with What We Do: Personality and Dangerousness at Work as Moderators of Identification and Person–Organization Fit Effects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About