2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.12.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure to Solar UVR Suppresses Cell-Mediated Immunization Responses in Humans: The Australian Ultraviolet Radiation and Immunity Study

Abstract: Animal and human studies show that exposure to solar-simulated UVR is immunomodulatory. Human studies that used natural sun exposure and controlled for confounding are rare. We immunized 217 healthy adults (age range ¼ 18e40 years) with a T-celledependent antigen, keyhole limpet hemocyanin, and measured personal clothing-adjusted UVR exposure (for 5 days before and after immunization), lifetime cumulative UVR exposure, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration at immunization, and potential confounding factors. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental studies indicate that UVR-induced immune suppression is both local and systemic and may affect delayed type hypersensitivity reactions. Exposure to SR may reactivate latent viral infections (e.g., herpes simplex virus) and epidemiological studies suggest that SR exposure may impair to some extent the effectiveness of vaccines [72][73][74]. As shown in Figure 1, several potential implications of SR-induced immune suppression (some of them involving a net beneficial effect while others result in adverse outcomes) are not yet clearly highlighted by experimental and epidemiological studies.…”
Section: Immune Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies indicate that UVR-induced immune suppression is both local and systemic and may affect delayed type hypersensitivity reactions. Exposure to SR may reactivate latent viral infections (e.g., herpes simplex virus) and epidemiological studies suggest that SR exposure may impair to some extent the effectiveness of vaccines [72][73][74]. As shown in Figure 1, several potential implications of SR-induced immune suppression (some of them involving a net beneficial effect while others result in adverse outcomes) are not yet clearly highlighted by experimental and epidemiological studies.…”
Section: Immune Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility that sun exposure may diminish the efficacy of vaccination has been considered; however, there are limited studies which have addressed this issue, particularly in humans (94,111,112). UV-induced immunosuppression could diminish memory-based immune responses to potentially compromise the efficacy of vaccines (111,113), with exposure dose an important consideration. For example, non-burning doses of solar-simulated light (3 × week; 1.3 × standard erythemal dose during "restoration phase" for 4 weeks, then 1 × week for 8 weeks) did not modify levels of anti-hepatitis B surface antigen-specific antibodies (measured at 12 weeks) when the vaccination was delivered at baseline and after 4 weeks (114).…”
Section: Could Sun Exposure Compromise Effective Vaccination?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, wearable UV dosimeters were used in studies of the general population 25,26 and melanoma survivors, 27‐29 which separately provided self‐reported sun protection used; however, reported sun protection was not used to adjust the UV dose 27‐30 . A recent study adjusted UV dose for the body surface area covered by clothing but did not include sunscreen in the hourly UV calculation 31 . Previous smartphone delivery of a mobile app providing reminders to apply/reapply sunscreen and get out of the sun, as well as time to sunburn demonstrated weak sun protection improvement in the randomized trial 32,33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%