2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure to the seminal plasma of different portions of the boar ejaculate modulates the survival of spermatozoa cryopreserved in MiniFlatPacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
76
4
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
76
4
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous results confirmed the existence of essential differences between the P1 and the rest of the ejaculate (Rodríguez-Martínez et al, 2009;Saravia et al, 2009) related to types and amounts of ions, proteins, bicarbonate and pH indicating that the P1 spermatozoa were still bathing in a substantial amount of fluid from the cauda epididymides, in which they were emitted at ejaculation, and that this would explain the better performance of the spermatozoa contained in this SRF-portion. The findings of the current study, have clearly shown that despite the SRF-P1 having a significantly larger relative 14 contents of total protein than the P1, these portions of the SRF displayed very similar protein profiles as assessed by 2DE and mass spectrometry (tryptic peptide mass fingerprint analysis and CID-MS/MS) (Fig.2).…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Previous results confirmed the existence of essential differences between the P1 and the rest of the ejaculate (Rodríguez-Martínez et al, 2009;Saravia et al, 2009) related to types and amounts of ions, proteins, bicarbonate and pH indicating that the P1 spermatozoa were still bathing in a substantial amount of fluid from the cauda epididymides, in which they were emitted at ejaculation, and that this would explain the better performance of the spermatozoa contained in this SRF-portion. The findings of the current study, have clearly shown that despite the SRF-P1 having a significantly larger relative 14 contents of total protein than the P1, these portions of the SRF displayed very similar protein profiles as assessed by 2DE and mass spectrometry (tryptic peptide mass fingerprint analysis and CID-MS/MS) (Fig.2).…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…the sperm peak-portion of the SRF (P1), appeared suitable for the more extensive use of frozen-thawed boar semen, since this protocol reduced the time involved in the handling of the semen (8-9 h are usually required to process an ejaculate using the current technique), diminished the inter-boar variability in the cryopreservation (probably as a concerted action of by the SP-composition of the P1 and the packing in cryobiologically advantageous containers such as the MFP; Saravia et al, 2009), and allow to use the rest of the ejaculate to produce routine liquid semen doses for conventional AI (Saravia et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Introduction: Boar spermatozoa behave differently to cryopreservation process depending on the ejaculate portion they are delivered in (Saravia et al 2009) apparently explained by quantitative differences in some SP-components (Alkmin et al 2014). This study evaluated if differences in SP-TAC among ejaculate portions might explain differences in sperm cryosurvival.…”
Section: St 11mentioning
confidence: 99%