2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182212188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure Worry: The Psychological Impact of Perceived Ionizing Radiation Exposure in British Nuclear Test Veterans

Abstract: Potential psychological issues faced by British nuclear test veterans have been under-researched. This study assessed the prevalence of clinically relevant anxiety in British nuclear test veterans and aimed to explore experiences of worry and the broader psychological impact of the British nuclear weapons testing programme. The Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (Short-Form) was completed by 89 British nuclear test veterans (33.7% met the criteria for clinically relevant anxiety). Nineteen veterans then participated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of this, they characterise insecurity as a state of ignorance, a lack of control, and the inability to take precautions against elements that could jeopardise an individual or group or render them defenceless (Sulestarini et al, 2020). Insecurity, according to Collett et al, (2021), is "the condition of worry or anxiety resulting from a real or perceived absence of protection." It alludes to a lack of or insufficient freedom from risk.…”
Section: New Media and Insecuritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this, they characterise insecurity as a state of ignorance, a lack of control, and the inability to take precautions against elements that could jeopardise an individual or group or render them defenceless (Sulestarini et al, 2020). Insecurity, according to Collett et al, (2021), is "the condition of worry or anxiety resulting from a real or perceived absence of protection." It alludes to a lack of or insufficient freedom from risk.…”
Section: New Media and Insecuritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epidemiological studies examining mortality and cancer incidence in test veterans, carried out up to 1998, showed limited evidence of any detectable effect although this has since been revised to show a small excess in mortality (RR = 1.02, 90% CI 1.00-1.05, p = 0.04), associated with similar increased risks for both cancer and non-cancer diseases [2][3][4]. Despite this, questions as to whether veterans could have received sufficient radiation exposure to cause harm and, worry about potential genetic risk to future generations of any historical radiation exposure, persist [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary health concern for individuals exposed to low-moderate doses is cancer although the debate for non-cancer diseases such as cardiovascular disease and cataracts arising after doses of less than 500 mSv, is ongoing [7]. The psychological impact of real and/or perceived low dose exposure is also of concern [5,8]. In total, 759 NT veterans were identified by the UK MoD as potentially receiving higher doses to that recorded and categorized into 'special groups' , such as those veterans who were involved in air plume sampling, cleaning of 'sampling' aircraft or, crew of HMS Diana who were tasked to sail through a nuclear plume [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epidemiological studies carried out up to 1998 show no evidence of a detectable effect on overall life expectancy or risk of cancer 22 , however this has recently been revised whereby a small excess in mortality (RR = 1.02, 90% CI 1.00–1.05, p = 0.04) associated with similar increased risks for both cancer and non-cancer diseases, compared to non-test veteran controls, is reported 23 . Throughout the intervening decades, questions as to whether veterans could have received sufficient radiation exposure to cause harm and, worry about potential genetic risk of any historical radiation exposure, persist 24 , 25 . We show elsewhere an over-representation of nuclear test families self-reporting congenital anomalies among their children or grandchildren compared to control families 26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%