“…The hypothesized relationship between parental illness perceptions and youths' self-stigma is derived partly from the principles of Weiner's attribution theory of stigmatization (Weiner, Perry, & Magnusson, 1988) suggesting that when others attribute negative behaviors on the part of an individual to factors that are controllable, intentional, and stable, they will be more likely react in negative, denigrating ways toward that person. Numerous studies find that parents who ascribe their child's negative or disruptive behavior to intentional, controllable, and stable factors that reside within the child rather than emanate from external or involuntary circumstances, are more likely to be hostile, critical, intrusive (components of expressed emotion), and to deliver harsher discipline (Barrowclough, Lobban, Hatton, & Quinn, 2001;Bolton et al, 2003;Heatherington, Tolejko, McDonald, & Funk, 2007;Johnston & Patenaude, 1994;Slep & O'Leary, 1998). Assuming that parents' illness perceptions directly and indirectly (i.e., via controlling or demeaning behaviors) impact the children's self concept (Barrowclough & Hooley, 2003;Sher et al, 2005), it is reasonable to expect parents' illness perceptions to influence selfstigma among adolescent MH consumers.…”