2008
DOI: 10.1271/bbb.70594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression and Characterization of Endochitinase C fromSerratia marcescensBJL200 and Its Purification by a One-Step General Chitinase Purification Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
41
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 might provide a basis for the possible involvement of the C-terminal ChBD between the insoluble α-chitin substrate binding and the SmChiC enzyme, but other interactions such as the presence of FnIII and other neighboring aromatic amino acid residues could not be totally excluded. These results obtained from this study were not completely consistent with previous findings in binding studies of ChiC1 and ChiC2 of S. marcescens 2170 toward the regenerated chitin, colloidal chitin, and powdered chitin [21,22,24,25]. Many C-terminally truncated chitinases have been reported to lose their chitin-binding abilities and hydrolyzing efficiencies toward various insoluble chitin substrates [13,37,[39][40][41].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…3 might provide a basis for the possible involvement of the C-terminal ChBD between the insoluble α-chitin substrate binding and the SmChiC enzyme, but other interactions such as the presence of FnIII and other neighboring aromatic amino acid residues could not be totally excluded. These results obtained from this study were not completely consistent with previous findings in binding studies of ChiC1 and ChiC2 of S. marcescens 2170 toward the regenerated chitin, colloidal chitin, and powdered chitin [21,22,24,25]. Many C-terminally truncated chitinases have been reported to lose their chitin-binding abilities and hydrolyzing efficiencies toward various insoluble chitin substrates [13,37,[39][40][41].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…44. Final purification was obtained by chitin affinity chromatography and hydrophobic interaction chromatography to isolate ChiC2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these chitinases retained 60% activity at alkali pH values between 7 and 11, although the highest activity was observed at pHs 8, 9, and 8.5 for ChiA, ChiB, and ChiC, respectively. The optimum pH values for the chitinases of S. marcescens were reported at 5.5 (Gal et al, 1998), 6.2 (Nawani andKapadnis, 2001), 5-6 (Brurberg et al, 1996), 5-7.5 (Lan et al, 2006), and 4-10 (Suzuki et al, 2002) for ChiA; 4-10 ( Suzuki et al, 2002;Bahar et al, 2012) and 5-6 (Brurberg et al, 1996) for ChiB; and 3-9 (Synstad et al, 2008) and4-10 (Suzuki et al, 2002) for ChiC. Researchers also reported bimodal pH distributions at around pH 4.0 and 8.0-9.0 (Okay et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chitinases have been detected in a great variety of organisms, including those that contain chitin, such as insects, crustaceans, yeasts, and fungi, and also organisms that do not contain chitin, such as bacteria, higher plants, and vertebrates. Several genera of bacteria, including Serratia (Watanabe et al, 1997;Suzuki et al, 2002), Enterobacter (Chernin et al, 1995), and Aeromonas (Weisburg et al, 1991;Wu et al, 2001;Synstad et al, 2008;Gökçe et al, 2010) produce high levels of chitinolytic enzymes (Nawani and Kapadnis, 2001). Others, such as Bacillus thuringiensis, produce chitinases in small amounts although they can be genetically manipulated to improve their chitinase production (Bhushan and Hoondal, 1998;BarbozaCorona et al, 1999;Lauzon et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%