Induction of the SOS response in Escherichia coli by DNA-damaging treatments results in the synthesis of the SulA polypeptide, and this is sufficient to cause the resulting inhibition of cell division. Mutations at either sul (sfiA) or sudB (sfiB) suppress this division inhibition. The SulB, protein is identical to FtsZ, a protein required for normal division in E. coli. In the presence of FtsZ, the half-life of SulA synthesized in maxicells is -12 min. In contrast, in the absence of FtsZ or in the presence of a mutant form of FtsZ (SulB114) that prevents division inhibition in vivo, SulA is extremely unstable with a half-life of only 3 min. Both FtsZ and SulA are isolated with the inner membrane ofE. coli maxicells in the presence of MgCl2. We propose that the SulA inhibitor interacts directly with FtsZ in vivo to block the essential division function of this protein.The sulB gene, which maps among a cluster of division and related genes at 2 min on the E. coli chromosome, has been postulated by several groups to be the target for the SulA inhibitor. Moreover, in contrast to sulA (11), sulB appears to be part of the normal cell division machinery. We have recently shown (12) that sulBJ14 maps to a locus identical with the ftsZ gene in E. coli. Similarly, Luktenhaus (13) has mapped other sulB alleles (sulB25 and sulB9) toftsZ. TheftsZ gene was shown previously to be essential for cell division in E. coli (14,15). In this study, we used sulA and sulB genes cloned in the same "maxicell" host to obtain evidence for a direct interaction between the SulA and SulB polypeptides. The results obtained indicate that both polypeptides associate with the E. coli inner membrane and that the product of suiB' stabilizes SulA in maxicells.Cell division in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli is initially inhibited and then resumes as DNA repair is completed and blocked replication forks resume elongation. Inhibition of cell division under these conditions was proposed by Witkin (1) to be an inducible function related to recovery from DNA damage. Subsequently, Huisman et al. (2) obtained direct evidence for an inducible inhibitor of division under control of the SOS recA/lexA damage-repair system. In addition, three major classes of mutant affected in this divisioninhibition response have been isolated. Mutations in Ion (3) largely prevent recovery from division inhibition, whereas sulA (sfiA) or sulB (sfMB) mutations (4, 5), which suppress the Lon-phenotype, relieve or reduce division inhibition following DNA damage. However, careful analysis of UV-and nalidixic acid-treated (6) or thymine-starved cells (2) has revealed that division inhibition under these conditions is blocked by at least two independent systems, the "SOS" sulA/suiB pathway and a second pathway which Burton and Holland (6) have suggested is due to failure to terminate DNA replication. Recently, D'Ari and Huisman (7) have reported the presence of a third, sflC-dependent pathway present in some E. coli K-12 strains. In this paper, we are concerned specifically...