Expression of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptors in Human Breast Cancer: Mass Versus Ligand Binding Capacity

Abstract

Thirty percent of lymph node-negative women with primary breast cancers are at high risk for early recurrence of metastatic disease and diminished survival. Identification of these high-risk patients is a long-term objective of our laboratory, and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was investigated as a prognostic factor, EGFR was measured by a ligand binding assay developed in house, in the competition mode that served as the "gold standard" for assessing receptor content and activity. In contrast, measurements of mass (content) were performed by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) from Ciba Corning Diagnostics (Alameda, CA) and by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) from Oncogene Science (Uniondale, NY). A total of 78 breast carcinomas were examined. The median binding capacity measured with [1251]EGF was 13 fmollmg membrane protein (range 0-981), that measured by EIA was 8 fmol/mg (range 1-725). while EGFR measured by ELISA was 135 (range 0-751).Distribution of EGFR did not appear to vary as a function of patient age Neither the results from EIA nor those from ELISA correlated with those obtained by the ligand binding assay. However, there was a good correlation of results obtained by the two antibodybased assays despite the fact that the calibration of standards was considerably different. These data suggest that EGFR should be measured by ligand binding assay for clinical studies; mass