2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13000-020-00985-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of FAM83H and ZNF16 are associated with shorter survival of patients with gallbladder carcinoma

Abstract: Background: Recently, FAM83H was reported to have roles in cancer progression in conjunction with oncogenic molecules such as MYC and b-catenin. Moreover, the data from the public database indicates a molecular relationship between FAM83H and zinc finger proteins, especially between FAM83H and ZNF16. However, studies on FAM83H and ZNF16 in gallbladder cancer have been limited. Methods: This study investigated the expression of FAM83H and ZNF16 in 105 gallbladder carcinomas. Results: In human gallbladder carcin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The immunohistochemical positivity of the nuclear expression of SCRIB (nSCRIB) and cytoplasmic expression of SCRIB (cSCRIB) was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis [ 25 ]. The cut-off points in ROC curve analysis for nSCRIB and cSCRIB were determined to predict the cancer-related death of patients [ 10 , 25 , 26 ]. The prognosis of ovarian carcinoma patients was evaluated for overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) through June 2015.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immunohistochemical positivity of the nuclear expression of SCRIB (nSCRIB) and cytoplasmic expression of SCRIB (cSCRIB) was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis [ 25 ]. The cut-off points in ROC curve analysis for nSCRIB and cSCRIB were determined to predict the cancer-related death of patients [ 10 , 25 , 26 ]. The prognosis of ovarian carcinoma patients was evaluated for overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) through June 2015.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immunohistochemical expression of SIRT6 was scored by adding the staining intensity score and staining area score. The staining intensity was scored from zero to three (0; no expression, 1; weak expression, 2; intermediate expression, and 3; strong expression), and the staining area was scored from zero to five (0: no stained cells; 1: 1%, 2: 2 ~ 10%, 3: 11 ~ 33%; 4: 34 ~ 66%; and 5: 67 ~ 100%) [ 10 , 31 , 37 – 39 ]. Thereafter, the final immunohistochemical staining score was obtained by adding the scores obtained from each TMA core, which ranged from zero to sixteen [ 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immunohistochemical expression of SIRT6 was scored by adding the staining intensity score and staining area score. The staining intensity was scored from zero to three (0; no expression, 1; weak expression, 2; intermediate expression, and 3; strong expression) and the staining area was scored from zero to ve (0: no expression; 1: weak expression; 2: intermediate expression; and 3: strong expression) and the staining area was scored from zero to ve (0: no stained cells; 1: 1%, 2: 2 ~ 10%, 3: 11 ~ 33%; 4: 34 ~ 66%; and 5: 67 ~ 100%) [10,31,[37][38][39]. Thereafter, the nal immunohistochemical staining score was obtained by adding the scores obtained from each TMA core, which ranged from zero to sixteen [38,39].…”
Section: Immunohistochemical Staining and Scoring In The Tissue Micromentioning
confidence: 99%