“…It was sug gested that in the cholesteryl-hemisuccinate-rigidified membranes, the tumor-associated antigens are presum ably more exposed and in a closer physical association between themselves and with components of the major histocompatibility complexes. In fact, it has been dem onstrated more recently that HLA-DR antigens ex pressed on tumor cells did not contribute to the skin reactivity induced by homologous cholesteryl-hemisuccinate-treated tumor cells in patients with metastatic melanoma [27], Membrane fluidity is also influenced by the presence of hydroxysterols, and in particular by 25-hydroxycholesterol [17,18], This oxysterol becomes inserted in cel lular membranes, including plasma membrane [28], in which it induces specific morphologic and functional changes [18], However, as evidenced in the present data, 25-hydroxycholesterol decreased membrane fluidity in renal carcinoma cells, but failed to cause an increased immunogenicity in the same proportion of patients. At present, the physical techniques to measure membrane fluidity provide at best rough indications of membrane fluidity in comparative studies, but give little or no insight in lateral heterogeneity or domains of lipids that may exist in biological membranes [29], Thus, physico chemical properties of a putative lipidic microdomain surrounding the tumor antigens, rather than global mem brane lipid fluidity, may be critical for eliciting specific changes in their expression or conformational state on the cell surface.…”