2003
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.10638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of Foxp2, a gene involved in speech and language, in the developing and adult striatum

Abstract: Many members of the forkhead/winged helix transcriptional factors are known to be regulators of embryogenesis. Mutations of the Fox gene family have been implicated in a range of human developmental disorders. Foxp2, a member of the Fox gene family, has recently been identified as the first gene that is linked to an inherited form of language and speech disorder. To elucidate the anatomical basis of language processing in the brain, we have examined the expression pattern of Foxp2 gene and its homologous gene,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

15
160
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
15
160
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess whether projection neuron numbers were also affected within the striatum, we immunostained coronal sections from PlexinA1 −/− mice and PlexinA1 +/ + littermates at E14.5 and E18.5 (n = 3 per age for each genotype) for the transcription factor Forkhead box protein P2 (FOXP2), a marker of developing striatal projection neurons (Takahashi et al, 2003). Counts of labeled cells throughout the rostrocaudal extent of the striatum showed a significant reduction in mutants compared with control littermates at E14.5 (medial levels PlexinA1 +/ + 711.21 ± 4.53 cells/10 5 µm 2 , PlexinA1 −/− 548.96 ± 4.57 cells/10 5 µm 2 ; P  < 0.00049) and at E18.5 ( PlexinA1 +/ + 840.45 ± 5.44 cells/10 5 µm 2 , PlexinA1 −/− 658.75 ± 5.48 cells/10 5 µm 2 ; P  < 0.00054; Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To assess whether projection neuron numbers were also affected within the striatum, we immunostained coronal sections from PlexinA1 −/− mice and PlexinA1 +/ + littermates at E14.5 and E18.5 (n = 3 per age for each genotype) for the transcription factor Forkhead box protein P2 (FOXP2), a marker of developing striatal projection neurons (Takahashi et al, 2003). Counts of labeled cells throughout the rostrocaudal extent of the striatum showed a significant reduction in mutants compared with control littermates at E14.5 (medial levels PlexinA1 +/ + 711.21 ± 4.53 cells/10 5 µm 2 , PlexinA1 −/− 548.96 ± 4.57 cells/10 5 µm 2 ; P  < 0.00049) and at E18.5 ( PlexinA1 +/ + 840.45 ± 5.44 cells/10 5 µm 2 , PlexinA1 −/− 658.75 ± 5.48 cells/10 5 µm 2 ; P  < 0.00054; Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ab16046, RRID: AB_210710) raised against a synthetic peptide in the C‐terminus of human FOXP2 was previously shown to immunolabel striatal projection neurons in the developing mouse forebrain (Takahashi et al, 2003; Hernandez‐Miranda et al, 2011). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isotope and nonisotope methods of in situ hybridization were performed as described (11,18 (19,20).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of FoxP2 is highly conserved during evolution as well (12), because the human FOXP2 protein differs at only 2 aa compared with its mouse homologue, along with one glutamine from the human protein that is absent in the polyQ tract in mouse Foxp2 (12). Human FOXP2 and mouse Foxp2 show quite similar expression patterns in the developing brain, with expression detected in the cortical plate, basal ganglia, thalamus, and inferior olive (13,14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The structure of FoxP2 is highly conserved during evolution as well (12), because the human FOXP2 protein differs at only 2 aa compared with its mouse homologue, along with one glutamine from the human protein that is absent in the polyQ tract in mouse Foxp2 (12). Human FOXP2 and mouse Foxp2 show quite similar expression patterns in the developing brain, with expression detected in the cortical plate, basal ganglia, thalamus, and inferior olive (13,14).Infant rodents emit ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs), whistle-like sounds with frequencies between 40 kHz and 100 kHz, when isolated from the mother and littermates (15). These signals play an important communicative role in mother-offspring interactions because they elicit prompt responses from the dam concerning caregiving behaviors (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%