Expression of Interest for Evolution of the Mu2e Experiment

F., Abusalma,; Ambrose, D.; Artikov, A.; Bernstein, R.; Blazey, G. C.; Bloise, C.; Boi, S.; T., Bolton,; J., Bono,; Bonventre, R.; Bowring, D.; Brown, D.; Byrum, K.; Campbell, M.; Caron, J. -F.; Cervelli, F.; Chokheli, D.; Ciampa, K.; Ciolini, R.; Coleman, R.; Cronin-Hennessy, D.; Culbertson, R.; Cummings, M. A.; Daniel, A.; Davydov, Y.; S., Demers,; D., Denisov,; Denisov, S.; Falco, S. Di; Diociaiuti, E.; Djilkibaev, R.; Donati, S.; Donghia, R.; Drake, G.; Dukes, E. C.; Echenard, B.; A., Edmonds,; Ehrlich, R.; Evdokimov, V.; Fabbricatore, P.; Ferrari, A.; Frank, M.; Gaponenko, A.; C., Gatto,; Z., Giorgio,; Giovannella, S.; Giusti, V.; Glass, H.; Glenzinski, D.; L., Goodenough,; Group, C.; Happacher, F.; Harkness-Brennan, L.; Hedin, D.; Heller, K.; Hitlin, D.; Hocker, A.; Hooper, R.; Horton-Smith, G.; Hu, C.; Hung, P. Q.; Hungerford, E.; Jenkins, M.; Jones, M.; Kargiantoulakis, M.; Khaw, K. S.; Kiburg, B.; Kolomensky, Y.; Kozminski, J.; Kutschke, R.; Lancaster, M.; Lin, D.; Logashenko, I.; Lombardo, V.; Luca, A.; Lukicov, G.; Lynch, K.; Martini, M.; A., Mazzacane,; Miller, J.; Miscetti, S.; Morescalchi, L.; Mott, J.; Mueller, S. E.; Murat, P.; Nagaslaev, V.; Neuffer, D.; Oksuzian, Y.; Pasciuto, D.; E., Pedreschi,; Pezzullo, G.; A., Pla-Dalmau,; Pollack, B.; Popov, A.; Popp, J.; Porter, F.; E., Prebys,; Pronskikh, V.; Pushka, D.; Quirk, J.; Rakness, G.; Ray, R.; Ricci, M.; Röhrken, M.; Rusu, V.; Saputi, A.; Sarra, I.; Schmitt, M.; Spinella, F.; D., Stratakis,; Strauss, T.; Talaga, R.; Tereshchenko, V.; Tran, N.; Tschirhart, R.; Usubov, Z.; Velasco, M.; R., Wagner,; Wang, Y.; Werkema, S.; Whitmore, J.; Winter, P.; Xia, L.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, R. -Y.; Zutshi, V.; Zwaska, R.

doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.02599

Cited by 19 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The LHCb experiment is well-advanced in the development and deployment of a fully GPU-based implementation of the first level trigger [43,44]. Mu2e-II [45], an evolution of the current Mu2e experiment, will face an increase of the total data rate by a factor of more than 10. The design of Mu2e-II is not yet finalized, though assumptions are made on the requirements for the TDAQ system to adopt a similar experimental setup as Mu2e, but with improved detector granularity by a factor of 2.…”

Section: Fpga-and Gpu-based Tdaq Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovations in trigger and data acquisition systems for next-generation physics facilities

Bartoldus¹,

Bernius²,

Miller³

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Data-intensive physics facilities are increasingly reliant on heterogeneous and large-scale data processing and computational systems in order to collect, distribute, process, filter, and analyze the ever increasing huge volumes of data being collected. Moreover, these tasks are often performed in hard real-time or quasi real-time processing pipelines that place extreme constraints on various parameters and design choices for those systems. Consequently, a large number and variety of challenges are faced to design, construct, and operate such facilities. This is especially true at the energy and intensity frontiers of particle physics where bandwidths of raw data can exceed 100 TB/s of heterogeneous, high-dimensional data sourced from 300M+ individual sensors. Data filtering and compression algorithms deployed at these facilities often operate at the level of 1 part in 10 5 , and once executed, these algorithms drive the data curation process, further highlighting the critical roles that these systems have in the physics impact of those endeavors. This White Paper aims to highlight the challenges that these facilities face in the design of the trigger and data acquisition instrumentation and systems, as well as in their installation, commissioning, integration and operation, and in building the domain knowledge and technical expertise required to do so.

show abstract

Section: Fpga-and Gpu-based Tdaq Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovations in trigger and data acquisition systems for next-generation physics facilities

Bartoldus¹,

Bernius²,

Miller³

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The best constraints available now are from SINDRUM II, which set a limit on the conversion rate in Au at < 7.0 × 10 −13 [28]. There are a number of upcoming experiments that are expected to improve these bounds significantly using aluminum nuclei: COMET is projected to set a limit of 7 × 10 −15 (2.6 × 10 −17 ) in Phase-I (Phase-II) [29,30], while Mu2e projects an eventual Phase-II sensitivity of 2.5 × 10 −18 [31,32]. A future experiment, PRISM/PRIME, aims to eventually push this sensitivity to the ∼ 10 −19 level [6,33,34].…”

Section: Low-energy Signatures Of Lepton Flavor Violationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Complementary Signals of Lepton Flavor Violation at a High-Energy Muon Collider

Homiller,

Lu,

Reece

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A muon collider would be a powerful probe of flavor violation in new physics. There is a strong complementary case for collider measurements and precision low-energy probes of lepton flavor violation (as well as CP violation). We illustrate this by studying the collider reach in a supersymmetric scenario with flavor-violating slepton mixing. We find that the collider could discover sleptons and measure the slepton and neutralino masses with high precision, enabling event reconstruction that could cleanly separate flavor-violating new physics signals from Standard Model backgrounds. The discovery reach of a high-energy muon collider would cover a comparably large, and overlapping, range of parameter space to future µ → e conversion and electron EDM experiments, and unlike precision experiments could immediately shed light on the nature of new physics responsible for flavor violation. This complementarity strengthens the case that a muon collider could be an ideal energy-frontier laboratory in the search for physics beyond the Standard Model.

show abstract

“…Yttrium doped barium fluoride crystals (BaF2:Y) have an ultrafast scintillation component with 0.5 ns decay time and a suppressed slow component [6]. An ultrafast BaF2:Y total absorption calorimeter is considered by the Mu2e-II experiment [3]. Cost-effective crystals and glasses are under development for the HHCAL concept.…”

Section: Table 1 Optical and Scintillation Properties Of Fast And Ult...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fast and radiation hard inorganic scintillators are needed to face challenges of the unprecedented harsh radiation environment expected by future HEP experiments at the energy frontier, such as the High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC) and the proposed Future Hadron Circular Collider (FCChh), where up to 500 Grad and 5×10 18 neq/cm 2 of one MeV equivalent neutron fluence are expected by the forward calorimeter [2]. Ultrafast inorganic scintillators are needed for future HEP experiments at the intensity frontier to mitigate high event rate and pileup [3]. Cost-effective inorganic scintillators are needed for crystal ECAL and the proposed HHCAL concept.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recent progress on inorganic scintillators for future HEP experiments

Zhu

2021

Hard X-Ray, Gamma-Ray, and Neutron Detector Physics XXIII

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Future HEP experiments at the energy and intensity frontiers present stringent challenges to inorganic scintillators in radiation tolerance, ultrafast time response and cost. This paper reports recent progress in radiation hard, ultrafast, and cost-effective inorganic scintillators for future HEP experiments. Examples are LYSO crystals for a precision time of flight detector, LuAG ceramics for an ultracompact, radiation hard shashlik sampling calorimeter, BaF2:Y crystals for an ultrafast calorimeter, and cost-effective scintillators for a homogeneous hadron calorimeter. Applications for Gigahertz hard X-ray imaging will also be discussed.

show abstract

Expression of Interest for Evolution of the Mu2e Experiment

Cited by 19 publications

References 0 publications

Innovations in trigger and data acquisition systems for next-generation physics facilities

Innovations in trigger and data acquisition systems for next-generation physics facilities

Complementary Signals of Lepton Flavor Violation at a High-Energy Muon Collider

Recent progress on inorganic scintillators for future HEP experiments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About