2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-008-9350-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of p27(Kip1), cyclin D3 and Ki67 in BPH, prostate cancer and hormone-treated prostate cancer cells

Abstract: p27((Kip1)), cyclin D3 and Ki67 are the markers of DNA damage and cell proliferation. The goal of the current study was to analyze expression of the markers in benign and malignant prostate cancer tissues. Activity of p27((Kip1)), cyclin D3 and Ki67 was immunohistochemically evaluated in different cells of BPH, prostate cancer (PCa) and hormonally treated prostate cancer (HTPCa) tissues. The tissue samples were derived by means of TURP or radical prostatectomy. Intensity of the expression was compared between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
10
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, differences in sample size (only 30 PCs), surgical technique (80% perineal prostatectomy), immunohistochemical evaluation (whole tissue area), follow up (only 21 months) and cases of biochemical recurrence (only 7%) do not allow direct comparison between this study and ours [30]. Likewise, the reported high frequency of cytoplasmic p27 localization in high grade tumors compared to low-grade ones [31] cannot be confirmed by our results, as we performed only nuclear p27 IHC assessment, consistent with the majority of previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, differences in sample size (only 30 PCs), surgical technique (80% perineal prostatectomy), immunohistochemical evaluation (whole tissue area), follow up (only 21 months) and cases of biochemical recurrence (only 7%) do not allow direct comparison between this study and ours [30]. Likewise, the reported high frequency of cytoplasmic p27 localization in high grade tumors compared to low-grade ones [31] cannot be confirmed by our results, as we performed only nuclear p27 IHC assessment, consistent with the majority of previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to investigate a potential effect in the prostate gland at the gene expression level derived from the intake of ETs‐rich food, we measured and compared the mRNA quantities of CDKN1A (p21) , MKi‐67 and c‐Myc in prostate tissues from control and supplemented patients. The pre‐selection of these cancer‐related markers was based on their key role on cell cycle and cell proliferation regulation 25, the reported differential expression of these genes in BPH and in PCa 27, 28, 33–36 and the modulation of their expression in PCa cells after exposure to PE 13, 30. In agreement with the previous reports 26, 35, our results show a statistically significant increase in the expression of c‐Myc in the PCa samples over the BPH group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The v‐myc myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog (avian) ( c‐Myc ) is a strong positive regulator of cell proliferation and has been found to be amplified in up to 72% of androgen‐independent PCa 26. MKi‐67 or antigen identified by monoclonal antibody Ki‐67 is a marker of cell growth and proliferation whose expression is increased in PCa and BPH relative to normal tissue 27, 28. Since the abnormal expression of these molecules is involved in cancer development and progression, the characterization of the proliferation patterns of BPH and PCa by analyzing the expression of genes involved in the regulation of cell cycle and proliferation may yield important information on the cells response to new therapeutic drugs and treatments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With few exceptions, clear and diverse clinical correlates are associated with alterations of p27 kip1 (Ben-Izhak et al, 2003; Chang et al, 2004; Cheng et al, 2000; Cheville et al, 1998; Claudio et al, 2002; Cordon-Cardo et al, 1998; Cote et al, 1998; De Marzo et al, 1998; Doganavsargil et al, 2006; Dreher et al, 2004; Drobnjak et al, 2003; Erdamar et al, 1999; Fernandez et al, 1999; Freedland et al, 2003; Guo et al, 1997; Halvorsen et al, 2003; Huang et al, 2008; Kibel et al, 2001, 2000, 2003; Kuczyk et al, 1999, 2001; Li et al, 2006; Nguyen et al, 2009; Nikoleishvili et al, 2008; Ribal et al, 2003; Romics et al, 2008; Thomas et al, 2000; Tsihlias et al, 1998; Vis et al, 2000, 2002; Wolters et al, 2010; Wu et al, 2007; Yang et al, 2002, 1998; Zeng et al, 2004) versus p21 cip1 (Aaltomaa et al, 1999; Baretton et al, 1999; Cheng et al, 2000; Facher et al, 1997; Lacombe et al, 2001; Matsushima et al, 1998; Omar et al, 2001; Sarkar et al, 1999). As detailed in Supplementary Table 1, low or no p27 kip1 is generally associated with poor outcomes, including shorter time to biochemical recurrence and reduced survival.…”
Section: Clinical Relevance Of Cell Cycle-ar Crosstalkmentioning
confidence: 99%