2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2019.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of programmed death ligand (PD-L1) in different tumors. Comparison of several current available antibody clones and antibody profiling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several PD-L1 assays are available in oncology, and they seem to be highly interchangeable in HNSCC (52), specially for assays evaluating tumor cells by the antibodies SP263, 22C3, and 28-8 (53). Concordance between staining scores that involve immune cells, and/or other antibodies (e.g., SP142) are more modest (53,54) and require more careful interpretation. In the pivotal phase 3 Checkmate-141 trial, OS and ORR were improved by nivolumab across the entire study population.…”
Section: Predictive Factors For Immunotherapy Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several PD-L1 assays are available in oncology, and they seem to be highly interchangeable in HNSCC (52), specially for assays evaluating tumor cells by the antibodies SP263, 22C3, and 28-8 (53). Concordance between staining scores that involve immune cells, and/or other antibodies (e.g., SP142) are more modest (53,54) and require more careful interpretation. In the pivotal phase 3 Checkmate-141 trial, OS and ORR were improved by nivolumab across the entire study population.…”
Section: Predictive Factors For Immunotherapy Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the 20% threshold was applied to various parameters of the total tissue cellularity, it is possible that this result arose due to selection or confirmation bias (34). Moreover, the use of different antibodies and dilution factors could account for the observed patterns due to false-positives as selected dilutions were not justified (37). Taking into consideration that EBV relationship to PD-L1 in tumour cell is unlikely, it is apparent that selected patients might benefit from targeted anti-PD-1 therapies as the 20% threshold relating PD-L1 to tumour microenvironment appears to show a more predominant EBV link to PD-L1 expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PD‐L1 expression on both the tumor cells (tumor proportion score, TPS) and CD8 + T‐cell infiltrate (tumor‐infiltrating immune cells, IC) or both (combined positive score, CPS) have been explored as potential predictors of response to ICI. In addition, several antibodies for PD‐L1 are have been developed for use in performing immunohistochemical stains, and the expression pattern of PD‐L1 can be variable based on the antibody used and the operator's interpretation 68 . In KEYNOTE‐016, membranous PD‐L1 expression occurred only in patients with dMMR cancer and was prominent on tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes and on tumor‐infiltrating macrophages located at the invasive fronts of the tumor ( p = .04) 34 .…”
Section: Predictors Of Response To Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%