2003
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-40584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of α, β, and γ Catenins in Vascularized and Nonvascularized Nerve Grafts During the Regeneration Process

Abstract: The authors investigated the expression of three kinds of catenins (alpha, beta, gamma) in vascularized and non-vascularized nerve grafts, using the rat sciatic nerve model. The vascularized nerve, 15 mm in length, was elevated with its nutrient vessels in the left hindlimb of rats. In the right hindlimb, a 15-mm segment of the sciatic nerve was elevated (resected) without the nutrient vessels as a non-vascularized nerve. Both nerves were sutured to the original site. At various periods up to 14 weeks after op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…β-catenin levels in the guide decreased significantly at ≤ 7 days followed by a rebound to baseline levels and a significant but lower decline from baseline at 21 and 28 days. Our observation is in contrast to a report by Hatoko et al that showed increased β -catenin expression in the graft portion of a nerve graft model of regeneration, however this difference might be explained by the fact that the previous study was evaluating expression in intact nerve grafts where our study included just the regenerated contents within a hollow guide [75]. …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…β-catenin levels in the guide decreased significantly at ≤ 7 days followed by a rebound to baseline levels and a significant but lower decline from baseline at 21 and 28 days. Our observation is in contrast to a report by Hatoko et al that showed increased β -catenin expression in the graft portion of a nerve graft model of regeneration, however this difference might be explained by the fact that the previous study was evaluating expression in intact nerve grafts where our study included just the regenerated contents within a hollow guide [75]. …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%