2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00335-005-0065-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression profiling identifies novel candidate genes for ethanol sensitivity QTLs

Abstract: The Inbred Long Sleep (ILS) and Inbred Short Sleep (ISS) mouse strains have a 16-fold difference in duration of loss of the righting response (LORR) following administration of a sedative dose of ethanol. Four quantitative trait loci (QTLs) have been mapped in these strains for this trait. Underlying each of these QTLs must be one or more genetic differences (polymorphisms in either gene coding or regulatory regions) influencing ethanol sensitivity. Because prior studies have tended to focus on differences in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because ethanol LORR is mediated by multiple molecular mechanisms, it is likely that distinct molecular mechanisms are responsible for hypnotic effect of different doses of ethanol. For example, at least four quantitative trait loci on different mouse chromosomes and 23 candidate genes have been identified, which are largely responsible for the heritable component of hypnotic sensitivity to ethanol in selected ILS and ISS strains of mice (Markel et al, 1997;Bennett and Johnson, 1998;Ehringer et al, 2001;MacLaren et al, 2006). Furthermore, genotypic differences in duration of ethanol-induced LORR can reflect differences in sensitivity, acute tolerance or ethanol clearance (Radcliffe et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because ethanol LORR is mediated by multiple molecular mechanisms, it is likely that distinct molecular mechanisms are responsible for hypnotic effect of different doses of ethanol. For example, at least four quantitative trait loci on different mouse chromosomes and 23 candidate genes have been identified, which are largely responsible for the heritable component of hypnotic sensitivity to ethanol in selected ILS and ISS strains of mice (Markel et al, 1997;Bennett and Johnson, 1998;Ehringer et al, 2001;MacLaren et al, 2006). Furthermore, genotypic differences in duration of ethanol-induced LORR can reflect differences in sensitivity, acute tolerance or ethanol clearance (Radcliffe et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cohorts analyzed separately, the same three loci, on chr 1, 3, and 8, explained much of the phenotypic variance. One of these intervals, on chr 1, also contains one of 15 genes with significant differences in expression between ILS and ISS in cerebellum (MacLaren et al, 2006) and ventral tegmentum (M. Miles, personal communication). X-ray repair complementing defective repair in Chinese hamster cells (Xrcc5) has a 2.5-fold higher expression in ISS strain and a human ortholog in a genomic region linked to ethanol sensitivity in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene expression profiles derived from microarray analysis can be compared across recombinant inbred strains or other genetic tools, and genes from QTLs with differential expression are likely to provide promising candidate genes in this endeavor (6, 109). Indeed, this was recently obtained for the alcohol-induced loss of righting reflex, as well as for alcohol preference and acute functional tolerance (110, 111). Several mouse candidate genes are also located in human alcohol sensitivity-associated QTLs (110).…”
Section: Preclinical Strategies For Identification Of Novel Targmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Indeed, this was recently obtained for the alcohol-induced loss of righting reflex, as well as for alcohol preference and acute functional tolerance (110, 111). Several mouse candidate genes are also located in human alcohol sensitivity-associated QTLs (110). The behavioral, gene expression and gene-sequence differences among recombinant inbred strains are being cumulatively added to online databases as strains are being tested for different phenotypes.…”
Section: Preclinical Strategies For Identification Of Novel Targmentioning
confidence: 79%