2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2014.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended accuracy analysis of a covariance matching approach for identifying errors-in-variables systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the simulation examples, the proposed F-MISG algorithm is more accurate than the MI-ESG algorithm for the same innovation length and the introduction of the forgetting factor can effectively improve the parameter estimation accuracy of the multi-innovation identification algorithms. The basic idea of the proposed methods can be extended to identify other linear systems [38,39] and nonlinear systems [40][41][42] with colored noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simulation examples, the proposed F-MISG algorithm is more accurate than the MI-ESG algorithm for the same innovation length and the introduction of the forgetting factor can effectively improve the parameter estimation accuracy of the multi-innovation identification algorithms. The basic idea of the proposed methods can be extended to identify other linear systems [38,39] and nonlinear systems [40][41][42] with colored noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where A = (I − B) −1 . The matrix in (16) is known as the 'model implied covariance matrix'. The estimation problem is to determine the vector ϑ that is 'compatible' with the observations in the sense that…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topic is also treated from different points of view in the books [11], [12]. A more recent development is represented by the covariance matching (CM) approach introduced in [13], [14], [15] and [16]. This approach has been shown to be related to structural equation modeling (SEM) techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17] Therefore, it is necessary to develop new identification methods for EIV systems. An overview of EIV system identification methods can be found in Reference 18, including the instrumental variable method, 19 the bias-eliminating LS method, 20,21 the covariance matching method, 22,23 the maximum likelihood (ML) method, 24 the total least squares (TLS) method, 25 the asymptotic method, 26 and so on. Recently, Zhang et al developed a novel version of the extended ML estimator, which can deal with EIV systems containing arbitrary but persistent excitations and colored disturbing noises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%