2013
DOI: 10.1080/02331934.2013.796473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended cutting plane method for a class of nonsmooth nonconvex MINLP problems

Abstract: In this article, a generalization of the αECP algorithm to cover a class of nondifferentiable Mixed-Integer NonLinear Programming problems is studied. In the generalization constraint functions are required to be f • -pseudoconvex instead of pseudoconvex functions. This enables the functions to be nonsmooth. The objective function is first assumed to be linear but also f • -pseudoconvex case is considered. Furthermore, the gradients used in the αECP algorithm are replaced by the subgradients of Clarke subdiffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Su et al (2015) have presented strategies such as multiple-generation cuts, hybrid methods and partial surrogate cuts for improving the e ciencies of the Outer Approximation and Generalized Benders Decomposition methods and Su et al (2016) have applied one of these techniques in a cracking production process. Other developments such as cutting plane methods (Eronen et al, 2015) and supporting hyperplane techniques (Westerlund et al, 2018) claim to produce easier convergence in nonsmooth, generalised convex formulations and demonstrate applicability to production and scheduling problems. Other methodologies for facilitating solutions in MINLP formulations of planning and scheduling problems include Lagrangian decomposition techniques (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Su et al (2015) have presented strategies such as multiple-generation cuts, hybrid methods and partial surrogate cuts for improving the e ciencies of the Outer Approximation and Generalized Benders Decomposition methods and Su et al (2016) have applied one of these techniques in a cracking production process. Other developments such as cutting plane methods (Eronen et al, 2015) and supporting hyperplane techniques (Westerlund et al, 2018) claim to produce easier convergence in nonsmooth, generalised convex formulations and demonstrate applicability to production and scheduling problems. Other methodologies for facilitating solutions in MINLP formulations of planning and scheduling problems include Lagrangian decomposition techniques (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we develop an efficient gradient descentbased method to update the predictive model parameter. This method is more efficient than the most popular optimization algorithm used in structured output prediction methods, cutting plane algorithm [6,8,7,1], because it avoids the time-consuming quadratic programming problem of cutting plane algorithm.…”
Section: Our Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can easily solve the continuous optimization problem; however, this has low precision in the process of converting continuous variables into integer variables, and perhaps may not find the optimal solution for some problems. (2) The deterministic method, which uses the branch boundary method [13] and the cutting-plane approach [14] to solve MIP problems. These methods are effective and efficient for solving small-scale problems but, when the scale of the problem increases and the degree of nonlinearity becomes higher, the deterministic method is usually incapable of solving the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%