2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended DLVO-based estimates of surface force in low salinity water flooding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
83
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(64 reference statements)
6
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that divalent cations effect on disjoining pressure at various concentration were not documented in this section because 0.1 wt % CaCl 2 and MgCl 2 already rendered negative disjoining pressures (Figure 3). Similar trend was also reported by Xie et al [34] who showed that increasing NaCl concentration solution shifts the disjoining pressure from positive to negative due to reduced electrostatic screening, suggesting an oil-wet system. …”
Section: Effect Of Cation Type and Concentration On Disjoining Pressuresupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is worth noting that divalent cations effect on disjoining pressure at various concentration were not documented in this section because 0.1 wt % CaCl 2 and MgCl 2 already rendered negative disjoining pressures (Figure 3). Similar trend was also reported by Xie et al [34] who showed that increasing NaCl concentration solution shifts the disjoining pressure from positive to negative due to reduced electrostatic screening, suggesting an oil-wet system. …”
Section: Effect Of Cation Type and Concentration On Disjoining Pressuresupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The surface species concentrations were calculated using PHREEQC version 3.3.9 (Parkhurst and Appelo 2013) and a diffuse layer surface model. Due to the fact that Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ have similar charge density, thus almost same disjoining pressure [34], we did not calculate the surface complexation in the presence of MgCl 2 , but NaCl and CaCl 2 with concentration of 0.1 and 5 wt % were included this section. It is also worth noting that, in our geochemical modelling, we did not consider the interaction between non-polar oil and calcite surfaces, e.g., hydrogen bonding, van der Waals interaction, ligand bridging, etc.…”
Section: Surface Complexation Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While wettability alternation is considered as the main mechanism behind LSE, the understanding of which factors control the wettability variation is incomplete due to the complexity of the interactions occurring in the oil/brine/rock system. The two approaches that reveal the controlling factors behind the wettability alteration are (a) double-layer expansion between fine particles and limited fines release (LFR) between oil/rock contact areas (Nasralla and Nasr-El-Din 2014;Tang and Morrow 1999a;Xie et al 2016) and (b) surface complexation modeling (Brady and Krumhansl 2012;Brady and Thyne 2016;Brady et al 2015;Mahani et al 2017;Xie et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proposed that the integration of pH gradient and DLE to be responsible for wettability alteration during low saline brine injection. Several studies have also shown the disjoining pressure (at small distances, where it is most effective) become more positive as the brine salinity is reduced [53,123,230,235]. Positive disjoining pressure indicates repulsion, which increase the thickness of water film and results in increased water-wetness (see Figure 11).…”
Section: Electrical Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 98%