Extended endocrine therapy in premenopausal breast cancer patients: Where are we now?

Abstract

Approximately 25% of new breast cancers are diagnosed in premenopausal patients, 50%‐70% presenting as estrogen receptor‐positive (ER+) breast tumors. Five‐year adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) with Tamoxifen is the cornerstone treatment for those patients but the evidence that up to 50% of ER + breast cancer distant recurrences develop after this time has now raised some questions. ATLAS and aTTom trials are the only two studies addressing the extension of Tamoxifen beyond 5 years in premenopausal patients. They showed significant DFS and OS benefits at a cost of increased rates of endometrial cancer and pulmonary embolus. Therefore, the selection of the patients at higher recurrence risk and hence deemed to get the most benefit from an extended endocrine therapy has become a major concern. Many clinical and genomic prognostic tools have shown validity in identifying patients at high late recurrence risk, but only the BCI prognostic score was shown to also be predictive of response to extended endocrine therapy. Nevertheless, all the evidence available on extended endocrine therapy in premenopausal patients was derived from trials in which patients were treated with tamoxifen alone and are hardly applicable to the current clinical scenario. In fact, the results of the SOFT and TEXT trials demonstrated the superiority of the addition of ovarian function suppression (OFS) and its association with the aromatase inhibitor (AI) Exemestane to Tamoxifen alone. However, the introduction in the clinical practice of AI + OFS‐based endocrine therapy for the premenopausal patients will very soon lead to an impasse since neither data exist on extended therapy after this treatment schedule nor is there an ongoing trial intended to obtain new evidence.