2018
DOI: 10.1080/14330237.2018.1475527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended family constellations workshop efficacy on intuition measure and experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiences of participants D, E, and F emphasize both intra-psychological (between the conscious and the unconscious) and transpersonal features (from the collective unconscious). Similar findings are reported in other studies [27,28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The experiences of participants D, E, and F emphasize both intra-psychological (between the conscious and the unconscious) and transpersonal features (from the collective unconscious). Similar findings are reported in other studies [27,28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The highest frequency home languages for participants in the sampled journals were Afrikaans and English. However, the language that data were collected in was often omitted by authors, with 12 studies reporting to collect data in the participants' home language and 32 in English (Geils & Edwards, 2018). It is important to note that certain studies collected data in English and other languages such as Kiswahili (Ndungu, Ndetei, Cronje, & Van Rooyen, 2018) or SiSwati (Ntinda & Dlamini, 2019).…”
Section: Information Of Influence Of Sample On Results 51mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome variables selected by study authors were quite diverse, which is not surprising considering the major role current (Weissman, Markowitz, & Klerman, 2008) or the internal representation of early (Young, Klosko, & Weishaar, 2003) interpersonal relationships play in our bio‐psycho‐social health. The studies showing no significant treatment benefit (Geils & Edwards, 2018; Goode, 2015; Sethi, 2009) reported comparable effect sizes to those reported in the studies showing statistically significant treatment benefit, raising the possibility that the former studies were simply underpowered (had too low sample sizes to detect existing treatment effects).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%