2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-218x(00)00200-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended finite automata over groups

Abstract: Some results from Dassow and Mitrana (Internat. J. Comput. Algebra (2000)), Griebach (Theoret. Comput. Sci. 7 (1978) 311) and Ibarra et al. (Theoret. Comput. Sci. 2 (1976) 271) are generalized for finite autómata over arbitrary groups. The closure properties of these autómata are poorer and the accepting power is smaller when abelian groups are considered. We prove that the addition of any abelian group to a finite automaton is less powerful than the addition of the multiplicative group of rational numbers. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted in [16,Theorem 2], it follows immediately from this lemma that for any monoid M , the family of languages L(M ) is equal to the union L(M 0 ) as M 0 runs through all finitely generated submonoids of M . Combining this with Lemma 5 yields a general result for any monoids K and H: if W (K 0 ) ∈ L(H) for every finitely generated submonoid K 0 of K, then L(K) ⊆ L(H).…”
Section: Automata With Counters For Free Products 87mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As noted in [16,Theorem 2], it follows immediately from this lemma that for any monoid M , the family of languages L(M ) is equal to the union L(M 0 ) as M 0 runs through all finitely generated submonoids of M . Combining this with Lemma 5 yields a general result for any monoids K and H: if W (K 0 ) ∈ L(H) for every finitely generated submonoid K 0 of K, then L(K) ⊆ L(H).…”
Section: Automata With Counters For Free Products 87mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In [16,Theorem 10], it is shown that L(F 2 × F 2 ) is the family of recursively enumerable languages.…”
Section: Languages Accepted By M -Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A DetCA is an UnCA; moreover, DetCA are effectively equivalent [9] to deterministic extended finite automata over (Z k , +, 0) (defined in [10]). Thus:…”
Section: Claimmentioning
confidence: 99%