2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-014-0755-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended formulations, nonnegative factorizations, and randomized communication protocols

Abstract: We show that the binary logarithm of the non-negative rank of a non-negative matrix is, up to small constants, equal to the minimum complexity of a randomized communication protocol computing the matrix in expectation. We use this connection to prove new conditional lower bounds on the sizes of extended formulations, in particular, for perfect matching polytopes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intuition behind this is that communication complexity often deals with boolean functions where the complexity mainly stems from the combinatorial structure. In contrast, in the framework in [5] and [6] arbitrary nonnegative values can be output, potentially containing a lot of information, and as the protocol has to be only correct in expectation, this model breaks several tradeoffs in communication (e.g., probability of being correct and bits exchanged are typically strongly related). We overcome these limitations by departing from the classical views of nonnegative matrix factorization as communication problems and related concepts (see e.g., [7] and [8]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The intuition behind this is that communication complexity often deals with boolean functions where the complexity mainly stems from the combinatorial structure. In contrast, in the framework in [5] and [6] arbitrary nonnegative values can be output, potentially containing a lot of information, and as the protocol has to be only correct in expectation, this model breaks several tradeoffs in communication (e.g., probability of being correct and bits exchanged are typically strongly related). We overcome these limitations by departing from the classical views of nonnegative matrix factorization as communication problems and related concepts (see e.g., [7] and [8]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Despite its many applications in different disciplines, our analysis is conducted with approximate extended formulations in mind. In fact due to Yannakakis's factorization theorem (see [3], [4]) and the equivalence to a communication model given in [5] and [6], it turns out that many open problems regarding the size of an optimal (exact or approximate) linear representation of a combinatorial optimization problem are equivalent to questions about the nonnegative rank of certain matrices and the related communication problems. These open problems include such important questions as to whether the matching polytope admits a linear programming formulation of polynomial size, whether MAXCUT cannot be approximated better than 1/2 − ε via any linear program of polynomial size, or whether a generic polygon needs a linear number of inequalities in any linear representation in the worst case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faenza et al [5] proved equivalence of extended formulations to communication complexity. Recently there has been also significant progress in terms of lower bounding the linear extension complexity of polytopes by means of information theory, see Braverman and Moitra [4] and Braun and Pokutta [2].…”
Section: Does Every 0/1 Polytope Have An Efficient Semidefinite Lift?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that stronger bounds on d can be placed by using generalizations of the rank [17]. Recent literature has established an intimate relation between the non-negative rank and the classical dimension and the positive semidefinite rank and the quantum dimension in similar scenarios [17,18]. It is immediate to check that the nonnegative rank of P and the positive semidefinite rank of P are lower bounds for d in the classical and quantum case respectively in the scenario considered here.…”
Section: A Dimension Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 86%