2015
DOI: 10.3390/molecules21010001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended Functional Groups (EFG): An Efficient Set for Chemical Characterization and Structure-Activity Relationship Studies of Chemical Compounds

Abstract: Abstract:The article describes a classification system termed "extended functional groups" (EFG), which are an extension of a set previously used by the CheckMol software, that covers in addition heterocyclic compound classes and periodic table groups. The functional groups are defined as SMARTS patterns and are available as part of the ToxAlerts tool (http://ochem.eu/alerts) of the On-line CHEmical database and Modeling (OCHEM) environment platform. The article describes the motivation and the main ideas behi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently an extended version of the program containing 583 manually curated functionalities encoded as SMARTS was published [7]. This list includes also numerous heterocyclic rings and general structural patterns (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently an extended version of the program containing 583 manually curated functionalities encoded as SMARTS was published [7]. This list includes also numerous heterocyclic rings and general structural patterns (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we performed a functional group analysis using ToxAlerts . ToxAlerts is an analytical feature of OCHEM intended for the identification of potentially toxic functional groups, however it also contains an extended functional group (EFG) category . This category allows the easy identification of the (binary) presence of over 500 different functional groups, of which 472 were present in the dataset.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural analysis involved a common scaffold search, structural similarity grouping, as well as analysis of chemical activity based on the known reactive functional moieties. 15 To estimate the quality of the filters, we used the assessment technique 10 used in our previous publication. 12 Considering that we had a smaller number of assays compared with both previous studies, we calculated the enrichment value (EV GST ) with the following equation: , where HITS i j shows the number of compounds that were active in the i GST/GSH assays (i = 0, 1, 2) and j GST/GSHfree assays (j = 0, 1, 2, 3) simultaneously.…”
Section: Identification Of Additional Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%