Extended Group Counseling With Psychiatry Residents

Sisson, Paul; Sisson, C. J.; Gadza, G.M.

doi:10.1177/104649647300400407

Cited by 7 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Different approaches to therapy have been tested using the HIM-G, with some success noted for feedback techniques (Leith & Uhlemann, 1972); self-viewing and discussion (Robinson, 1970); individualized behavior goal setting (Uhlemann & Weigel, 1977); therapist activity (Kanas, Barr, & Dossick, 1985;Kanas & Smith, 1990); experiential leader style (Lewis & Mider, 1973); and short-term models of therapy with marital couples, adults, and adolescents (Silbergeld, Manderscheid, & Koenig, 1977). In comparing the HIM-G with other measures, Roe and Edwards (1978) found that the HIM-G and the Tmax and Carkhuff scales complemented each other, whereas Sisson, Sisson, and Gazda (1977) determined that the Bonney scale and HIM-G were not independent, discovering a linear relationship between the two rating systems.…”

Section: Previous Research With the Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Hill Interaction Matrix: Therapy through dialogue.

Fuhriman¹,

Burlingame²

The Process of Group Psychotherapy: Systems for Analyzing Change.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Hill Interaction Matrix (HIM) is a behavioral rating system that measures the therapeutic quality of group participant interactions. Accordingly, the HIM articulates an explicit value system for what is deemed "therapeutic" in group member interactions. This value system emerged from a rich theoretical heritage of group dynamics, which is summarized first. In the next section we briefly describe the most recent version of the HIM and how the value system was used to develop the two dimensions of member behavior (i.e., content and work style) rated by the Hill Interaction Matrix-Statement by Statement (HIM-SS). We then focus on the correspondence between the theory and measure, examining the psychometric strengths and limitations of the HIM-SS as well as findings from previous research. After applying the HIM-SS to a common transcript, we close with a discussion on the unique contribution made by HIM to both the group literature and the training of neophyte group therapists.The development of the HIM extended over two decades (1950s-We acknowledge the contribution of William Fawcett Hill, who furnished historical and contextual background, and Priscilla S. Hill, who provided consultation on the history, development, and recent use of the Hill Interaction Matrix.

show abstract