2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13509-5_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended Islands of Tractability for Parsimony Haplotyping

Abstract: Abstract. Parsimony haplotyping is the problem of finding a smallest size set of haplotypes that can explain a given set of genotypes. The problem is NP-hard, and many heuristic and approximation algorithms as well as polynomial-time solvable special cases have been discovered. We propose improved fixed-parameter tractability results with respect to the parameter "size of the target haplotype set" k by presenting an O * (k 4k )-time algorithm. This also applies to the practically important constrained case, wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, we hope our results will provide insights into the general haplotype inference problem, which has yet to be understood completely. Finally, as a possible future direction of research, it would be useful to extend the results here and in succeeding papers [11,13] to hold for weighted variants of the problems discussed.…”
Section: Conclusion and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, we hope our results will provide insights into the general haplotype inference problem, which has yet to be understood completely. Finally, as a possible future direction of research, it would be useful to extend the results here and in succeeding papers [11,13] to hold for weighted variants of the problems discussed.…”
Section: Conclusion and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Here we present polynomial-time algorithms with slightly slower running-times for the (α, β) bounded cases of (*,1), (2,*), (5,2), and (3,3). In the second part of the paper we show that like PH [31], CPH is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the number of haplotypes in a minimum size resolution H ⊆ H of G. The running-time of this algorithm was improved recently by Fleischer et al [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A variant where haplotypes can only be picked from a prescribed pool H was considered by Fellows et al [129] who showed a O(k O(k 2 ) n 2 m)-time algorithm. Fleischer et al [130] later presented an O(k 4k+3 m)-time algorithm for the unconstrained version that can also solve the constraint version in O(k 4k+3 m|H | 2 ) time (indeed, these running times can be decreased to O(k 4k+2 m) and O(k 4k+2 m|H |) on average using perfect hashing) as well as a size-O(2 k k 2 ) kernel. Their algorithm can also output all optimal solutions.…”
Section: Haplotype Inference (Alias Haplotype Phasing Population Haplotyping) (Hi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the only previous fixed-parameter algorithm for MINIMUM RAINBOW SUBGRAPH that we are aware of. There are, however, several results on the parameterized complexity of PARSIMONY HAPLOTYPING [7][8][9]. RAINBOW SUBGRAPH is also a special case of SET COVER WITH PAIRS [10] which, in graph-theoretic terms, corresponds to the case where the input is a multigraph with vertex weights and the aim is to find a minimum-cost rainbow cover.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%