2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended Karush-Kuhn-Tucker condition for constrained interval optimization problems and its application in support vector machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Condition (2), known as the Kuhnna-Tucker theorem [6], defines the optimum point as a point stationary in the coordinate when constraints such as equality are satisfied and the goal function is insensitive to constraints such as inequality. In this simple but important problem, let us trace the meaning of the Lagrange multipliers…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Condition (2), known as the Kuhnna-Tucker theorem [6], defines the optimum point as a point stationary in the coordinate when constraints such as equality are satisfied and the goal function is insensitive to constraints such as inequality. In this simple but important problem, let us trace the meaning of the Lagrange multipliers…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antczak et al [31] studied the optimality conditions and duality results for nonsmooth vector optimization problems with multiple IVFs [32]. In 2019, Ghosh [33] have extended the KKT condition for constrained IVOPs. In addition, Van [34] investigated the duality results for interval-valued pseudoconvex optimization problems with equilibrium constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2016, Singh et al [33] proposed the concept of Pareto optimal solution for the interval-valued multi-objective programming problems. Many other researchers have also proposed optimality conditions and solution concepts for IOPs, see for instance [1,12,15,16,35] and the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%