2020
DOI: 10.1063/1.5124144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended-magnetohydrodynamics in under-dense plasmas

Abstract: Extended-magnetohydrodynamics transports magnetic flux and electron energy in high-energy-density experiments, but individual transport effects remain unobserved experimentally. Two factors are responsible in defining the transport: electron temperature and electron current. Each electron energy transport term has a direct analogue in magnetic flux transport. To measure the thermally-driven transport of magnetic flux and electron energy, a simple experimental configuration is explored computationally using a l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulations were run without the convection of magnetic field by heat flow (the Nernst effect). In general 71 73 , thermally-driven magnetic field transport occurs both perpendicular to the magnetic field at the Nernst velocity and perpendicular to both the magnetic field and the temperature gradient at the Nernst-cross-field velocity where are the components of the thermoelectric tensor 74 , 75 . Nernst advection dominates over the cross-field advection at low magnetization, while the opposite is true for .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations were run without the convection of magnetic field by heat flow (the Nernst effect). In general 71 73 , thermally-driven magnetic field transport occurs both perpendicular to the magnetic field at the Nernst velocity and perpendicular to both the magnetic field and the temperature gradient at the Nernst-cross-field velocity where are the components of the thermoelectric tensor 74 , 75 . Nernst advection dominates over the cross-field advection at low magnetization, while the opposite is true for .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significant kinetic effects on the Biermann battery provide motivation to validate our modelling with experiment. We have proposed a simple experiment where a ns pulse length laser of intensity ∼10 14 W cm −2 heats an underdense gas (electron density ∼10 19 cm −3 ) similar to previous experiments [ 2 , 31 ] (and suggested experiments [ 32 ]). Synthetic proton radiography shows that such an experiment can demonstrate the inaccuracy of MHD modelling of the Biermann battery when a thermal flux limiter is used, although the direct effect of the distortion of the electron distribution function is smaller and so harder to observe, requiring a proton radiography set-up at the limit of size that could be fielded experimentally for sufficient magnification (though measurement of the indirect effect would not require such a high magnification).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The final form of the induction equation is therefore composed only of an advection term, a diffusion term, the resistivity gradient term and two source terms that are still active even when B = 0 [9], right left right left right left right left right left right left3pt0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278emBt=×(bolduboldB×B)+η0normal∇2Bη0×(×B)ne×Tenee+β0normal′(Z~)eZ~×Te. The first term causes advection of the magnetic field at velocity u B , although it has no effect when the advection is along the field line. The field advection velocity is given by uB=boldufalse(1+δfalse)Jnee+δboldJ×<...>…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%