1993
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(93)90481-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended parameterization of nuclear-reaction cross sections for few-nucleon nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these and other reasons, these reactions have been studied over a wide range of center-of-mass energies E (E= 3.0 keV to 30 MeV), where the available data reported by various groups [5][6][7][8] agree rather well (within 10%).…”
Section: Introduction the D(dp)t And D(d N)3he Fusion Reactions (Inmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For these and other reasons, these reactions have been studied over a wide range of center-of-mass energies E (E= 3.0 keV to 30 MeV), where the available data reported by various groups [5][6][7][8] agree rather well (within 10%).…”
Section: Introduction the D(dp)t And D(d N)3he Fusion Reactions (Inmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The cross section data, now attributed to the effective energy E ′ , are then transformed into astrophysical S-factors S(E ′ ). For the exponent in the Gamow factor we used 2πη(E) = 68.75/ (E) (with E in keV), in accordance with [4,16]. As expected, the new astrophysical S-factors are significantly smaller than those reported in [4,7] (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…As in [7] we used the 3-rd order polynomial (n = 3) parametrization given in [16] for the bare-nuclei cross section. We find U e = 117 ± 7 eV with a χ 2 -value of 0.5 per degree of freedom.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 11 shows the final two-body cross section as obtained in the present work (solid symbols) together with the direct data (open symbols) [61][62][63][64][65] used for the normalization procedure. The very good agreement between the two data sets confirms the usefulness of the MPWBA analysis in correctly describing the studied process at low energies.…”
Section: From the Qf Coincidence Data To The Indirect Two-body Cromentioning
confidence: 99%