1974
DOI: 10.1016/0094-4548(74)90147-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended performance evaluation criteria for enhanced heat transfer surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bergles et al [2] have suggested several criteria for the performance evaluation of enhancement devices. The performance of the present geometry has been evaluated on the basis of the following two important criteria:…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bergles et al [2] have suggested several criteria for the performance evaluation of enhancement devices. The performance of the present geometry has been evaluated on the basis of the following two important criteria:…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several publications during the past fifteen years have discussed presentation of performance data and rational procedures to evaluate enhanced tube performance (for example, [167][168][169][170][171][172]). Most of the discussions have concerned single-phase heat transfer, but Jensen [171] and Webb [172] concentrated on evaporation and condensation.…”
Section: Exchanger Pfsimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bergles and co-workers [18][19] showed that when two independent or co-dependent heat transfer systems are placed under comparison then the possible merits and demerits of one system relative to the other depend on the nature of goals to be achieved and the set of constraints restricting them. Feasible goals may include increasing the heat transfer rate at the same time compacting the size of fins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%