Forty clinical isolates of Enterobacter spp. were identified as extended-spectrum -lactamase (ESBL) producers by disk diffusion. The VITEK 2 Advanced Expert System (AES) identified the ESBL phenotype in only 25 isolates (62.5%), and erroneously reported cephalosporin susceptibility in 11 isolates (28%). Refinements in the AES are required in order to improve ESBL detection in Enterobacter.Accurate identification of extended-spectrum -lactamase (ESBL) production is essential for the appropriate reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility results, since ESBLs render penicillins, cephalosporins, and aztreonam inadequate for treatment of serious infections (2). While guidelines exist for ESBL detection in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Proteus mirabilis isolates only (2), these enzymes are produced by a wide variety of other gram-negative organisms as well, including Enterobacter spp. (3,8,12,13).The VITEK 2 Advanced Expert System (AES; bioMérieux, Durham, NC) is an automated system that uses the antimicrobial susceptibility data generated to suggest the phenotype of the tested isolate and thereby determine susceptibility or resistance to antibiotics not tested (10). It has been used successfully to determine ESBL presence in E. coli and Klebsiella spp. (14, 16). Although ESBL detection in Enterobacter spp. by earlier automated systems, including VITEK, was hampered by the production of AmpC -lactamase (17), the more recently developed AES has not been evaluated for Enterobacter specifically. Given the high proportion of ESBL production among Enterobacter isolates at our institution and elsewhere (8,12) and the fact that the AES includes ESBL production among the resistance mechanisms it suggests for Enterobacter isolates, we sought to determine the accuracy of the AES in ESBL detection among clinical isolates of Enterobacter.Forty unique-patient isolates of Enterobacter were included (30 E. cloacae isolates and 10 E. aerogenes isolates). These epidemiologically unrelated isolates were identified phenotypically as ESBL producers via the disk diffusion method established for E. coli, Klebsiella spp., and P. mirabilis (2, 3), using 30-g cefotaxime-, ceftazidime-, and cefepime-impregnated disks with and without 10 g clavulanic acid (cefotaxime-and ceftazidime-containing disks made by Oxoid [Basingstoke, Hampshire, England]; cefepime-containing disks were prepared in-house). Although CLSI does not recommend the disk diffusion method for Enterobacter, we and others have previously noted a strong correlation between demonstration of a clavulanic acid effect and the presence of an ESBL gene (3,12,15). E. coli ATCC 25922 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 were used as negative and positive controls for ESBL production, respectively.Susceptibility profiles and suggested resistance mechanisms were recorded by the AES for each isolate. All isolates not identified as ESBL producers by VITEK were subjected to further study in order to demonstrate ESBL presence. Screening for the common ESBL gene families (TEM, SHV, O...