2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21000-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended visuomotor experience with inverted movements can overcome the inversion effect in biological motion perception

Abstract: Studies have demonstrated that perceiving human and animal movements as point-light displays is effortless. However, simply inverting the display can significantly impair this ability. Compared to non-dancers and typical dancers, vertical dancers have the unique experience of observing and performing movements upside down as being suspended in the air. We studied whether this unique visuomotor experience makes them better at perceiving the inverted movements. We presented ten pairs of dance movements as point-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 shows the mixed-design ANOVA results for d'. Because the current study involved direct replication of a previous study (Wang et al, 2022) For the significant main effect of Recording Type, sensitivity to the artificial inversion of ground movement (mean = 1.27, SE = 0.10) was significantly greater than that of air movement (mean = -0.10, SE = 0.11, p < 0.001). As expected, participants across all experience levels were more familiar with movements performed on the ground and, therefore, were more sensitive to the artificial inversion of ground movements.…”
Section: Perceptual Judgmentmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Table 2 shows the mixed-design ANOVA results for d'. Because the current study involved direct replication of a previous study (Wang et al, 2022) For the significant main effect of Recording Type, sensitivity to the artificial inversion of ground movement (mean = 1.27, SE = 0.10) was significantly greater than that of air movement (mean = -0.10, SE = 0.11, p < 0.001). As expected, participants across all experience levels were more familiar with movements performed on the ground and, therefore, were more sensitive to the artificial inversion of ground movements.…”
Section: Perceptual Judgmentmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Based on findings of a previous study (Wang et al, 2022), it was expected that, due to their extended visuomotor experience, VDs were more sensitive to the inversion of air movements than NDs and TDs when given complete dynamic information and regardless of the movement's congruency. In this context, the goal of eye tracking analysis is to investigate the source of the visual information in the animation that VDs focused on to achieve higher sensitivity.…”
Section: Eye Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations