2019
DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2018.2886276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending 2-D Convolutional Neural Networks to 3-D for Advancing Deep Learning Cancer Classification With Application to MRI Liver Tumor Differentiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A source model trained with widely available 'natural' images can be transferred to a target model that will perform similar tasks but in the medical imaging domain. The learnt feature detectors of these deep architectures as a result of their low-level status can be an alternative and viable (22) MGMT state 94.9/-Grinband et al (19) MGMT state 83/84 Akkus et al (23) 1p19q codeletion status 87.7/-Grinband et al (19) 1p19q codeletion status 92/88 Bonte et al (25) Glioma grading 91.1,93.5/82,86.1 Zhou et al (27) Metastatic/glioma/meningioma 92.1/-Momeni et al (28) Oligendroglioma/astrocytoma 85/92 Afshar et al (29) Glioma/pituitary/meningioma 86.6/-Yu et al (31) EGFR mutation status 76.1/82.8 Wang et al (32) EGFR mutation status 73.9/81 Zhu et al 34Luminal A vs others -/58-65 Ha et al (35) Luminal A vs. B vs. HER2 + vs. Basal 70/87.1 Yoon et al (36) Pathological state, ER, PR, HER2 -/69.7, 97.6, 89.9, 84.2 Zhu et al (37) Occult invasive disease status -/70 Ypsilantis et al (8) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy response 73.4/66.3 Bibault et al (38) Neoadjuvant chemoradiation response 80/72 Chen et al (39) Subtype prediction 80, voting: 92.3/-Trivizakis et al (12) Primary/metastasis 83/80 Cha et al (40) Chemotherapy response -/62-77 Cha et al (41) Chemotherapy response -/62-79 Banerjee et al (42) Subtype prediction 85/-Zhou et al (43) Lymph node metastasis 72.7-93/65-92 IDH1, isocitrate dehydrogenase isozyme 1; MGMT, methylguanine methyltransferase; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; ACC, accuracy; AUC, area under the curve.…”
Section: Multi-model Decision Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A source model trained with widely available 'natural' images can be transferred to a target model that will perform similar tasks but in the medical imaging domain. The learnt feature detectors of these deep architectures as a result of their low-level status can be an alternative and viable (22) MGMT state 94.9/-Grinband et al (19) MGMT state 83/84 Akkus et al (23) 1p19q codeletion status 87.7/-Grinband et al (19) 1p19q codeletion status 92/88 Bonte et al (25) Glioma grading 91.1,93.5/82,86.1 Zhou et al (27) Metastatic/glioma/meningioma 92.1/-Momeni et al (28) Oligendroglioma/astrocytoma 85/92 Afshar et al (29) Glioma/pituitary/meningioma 86.6/-Yu et al (31) EGFR mutation status 76.1/82.8 Wang et al (32) EGFR mutation status 73.9/81 Zhu et al 34Luminal A vs others -/58-65 Ha et al (35) Luminal A vs. B vs. HER2 + vs. Basal 70/87.1 Yoon et al (36) Pathological state, ER, PR, HER2 -/69.7, 97.6, 89.9, 84.2 Zhu et al (37) Occult invasive disease status -/70 Ypsilantis et al (8) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy response 73.4/66.3 Bibault et al (38) Neoadjuvant chemoradiation response 80/72 Chen et al (39) Subtype prediction 80, voting: 92.3/-Trivizakis et al (12) Primary/metastasis 83/80 Cha et al (40) Chemotherapy response -/62-77 Cha et al (41) Chemotherapy response -/62-79 Banerjee et al (42) Subtype prediction 85/-Zhou et al (43) Lymph node metastasis 72.7-93/65-92 IDH1, isocitrate dehydrogenase isozyme 1; MGMT, methylguanine methyltransferase; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; ACC, accuracy; AUC, area under the curve.…”
Section: Multi-model Decision Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis of liver cancer with traditional machine learning techniques is extremely challenging considering its multifocal distribution. Tissue discrimination between primary and metastatic liver cancer was performed by utilizing 3D-CNN (12) with no pre-processing or segmentation from raw high b-value MRI volumes (b=1,000 sec/mm 2 ) achieving state-of-the-art performance through a fully automated analysis.…”
Section: Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (Nsclc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[51][52][53] For example, Chang et al proposed a framework of multiple residual convolutional neural networks to noninvasively predict isocitrate dehydrogenase genotype in grades II-IV glioma using multi-institutional magnetic resonance imaging datasets. Besides, AI has been used in discovering radiogenomic associations in breast cancer, 52 liver cancer, 54 and colorectal cancer. 53 Currently, limited data availability remains the most formidable challenge for AI radiogenomics.…”
Section: Future Synergies Between Ai and Precision Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in equation (9) where and are their biases and is the weight, are the binary states of visible unit j and the hidden unit i. Through this energy function the network allocates a likelihood to any pair of a visible and hidden layer:…”
Section: Mathematical Analysis Using Preposition 3: Fully Convolutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the scope of this challenge illustrates the need for computerized analytics to help clinicians diagnose, detect, and evaluate hepatic metastases in CT tests [9]. Due to the various contrast actions of hepatic and parenchymatic lesions, automatic identification and segmentation have been extremely challenging [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%