2022
DOI: 10.1080/17501229.2022.2070626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending a learning ecology with virtual reality mobile technology: oral proficiency outcomes and students’ perceptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mobile devices have also been considered effective tools in developing vocabulary (e.g., Honarzad & Soyoof, 2023;Kara, 2022;Li & Cummins, 2019;Li & Hafner, 2022;van Lieshout & Cardoso, 2022), speaking skills (e.g., Le & Nguyen, 2021;Sun et al, 2017), pronunciation (e.g., Fithriani, 2021;Fouz-Gonzá lez, 2020), writing skills (e.g., Andujar, 2016;Wang & Jiang, 2021), and dynamic assessment (Rassaei, 2021). However, relatively little research work has been done to examine learners' acceptance of mobile devices in language learning, even though it is important to explore and consider learner perspectives before implementing MALL (Botero et al, 2018;Hoang et al, 2022;Hoi, 2020;Luo & Watts, 2022). For example, Chwo et al (2018) examined 213 studies and found -significant discrepancies between how teachers and instructional designers expect MALL devices to be used and how the students actually use them‖ (p. 62).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobile devices have also been considered effective tools in developing vocabulary (e.g., Honarzad & Soyoof, 2023;Kara, 2022;Li & Cummins, 2019;Li & Hafner, 2022;van Lieshout & Cardoso, 2022), speaking skills (e.g., Le & Nguyen, 2021;Sun et al, 2017), pronunciation (e.g., Fithriani, 2021;Fouz-Gonzá lez, 2020), writing skills (e.g., Andujar, 2016;Wang & Jiang, 2021), and dynamic assessment (Rassaei, 2021). However, relatively little research work has been done to examine learners' acceptance of mobile devices in language learning, even though it is important to explore and consider learner perspectives before implementing MALL (Botero et al, 2018;Hoang et al, 2022;Hoi, 2020;Luo & Watts, 2022). For example, Chwo et al (2018) examined 213 studies and found -significant discrepancies between how teachers and instructional designers expect MALL devices to be used and how the students actually use them‖ (p. 62).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] Diem Thi Ngoc Hoang, Maggie McAlinden and Nicola F. Johnson investigated the potential of virtual reality (VR) to develop the oral proficiency of EFL students and their perceptions of using VR mobile technology in EFL learning. [10]Their research results showed VR can improve the efficiency of oral English training, the experimental group had more interactions and made more attempts to improve their speaking. The findings showed that the application of VR decreased the students' PSA and the PQP-PTVR approach may enhance learners' speaking proficiency and improve their interactions.…”
Section: Studies On Vr In Efl Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these challenges, there is a pressing need for innovative approaches that leverage the power of big data management and mining techniques, augmented by intelligent technologies. By harnessing the capabilities of advanced data processing algorithms and machine learning models, educators and researchers can gain deeper insights into student behaviour, learning patterns, and performance metrics [2]. These insights, in turn, can inform the design of more effective teaching strategies, personalized learning experiences, and targeted interventions to support student success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%