2023
DOI: 10.1037/str0000294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending and intensifying work as mediators in the relationship between weekly time pressure and fatigue: The moderating role of perfectionism.

Abstract: Extending and intensifying work are two self-endangering work strategies that have been shown to impair employee health and well-being. In this study, we investigate with a weekly design the mediating effect of extending and intensifying work in the interplay of time pressure and fatigue. In addition, we explore the role of dispositional perfectionism (perfectionistic strivings and concerns) in this relationship. A sample of 175 teachers responded to weekly surveys over 6 weeks. Multilevel moderated mediation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
(97 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, different employees may understand work in the evening as working time vs. work during their off-job time. As a consequence, some participants may have experienced TASW events (e.g., they continued a work task in the evening) but answered "no" to the respective items because they understood them as work extension (Mullan and Wajcman, 2019;Hoppe et al, 2023). As the question of what counts as working time and what does not can differ more and more on an individual or even the day level, future studies could ask directly what participants consider to be their working time and what is work during off-job hours (i.e., TASW)-in general (e.g., during a baseline questionnaire) or on a daily basis (e.g., during every evening questionnaire).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, different employees may understand work in the evening as working time vs. work during their off-job time. As a consequence, some participants may have experienced TASW events (e.g., they continued a work task in the evening) but answered "no" to the respective items because they understood them as work extension (Mullan and Wajcman, 2019;Hoppe et al, 2023). As the question of what counts as working time and what does not can differ more and more on an individual or even the day level, future studies could ask directly what participants consider to be their working time and what is work during off-job hours (i.e., TASW)-in general (e.g., during a baseline questionnaire) or on a daily basis (e.g., during every evening questionnaire).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%