2017
DOI: 10.1186/s40352-016-0046-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending smoking abstinence after release from smoke-free prisons: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Abstract: BackgroundA smoking ban was implemented across all prisons in Queensland, Australia, in May 2014, with the aim of improving the health of prisoners and prison staff. However, relapse to smoking after release from prison is common. Only one previous study, conducted in the United States, has used a randomised design to evaluate an intervention to assist individuals in remaining abstinent from smoking following release from a smoke-free prison.MethodsThis paper describes the rationale for and design of a randomi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, a considerable body of evidence suggests that imprisonment may represent a unique opportunity to identify individuals with a history of substance use and initiate addiction treatments that significantly improve their health ( Degenhardt et al, 2014 ; de Andrade and Kinner, 2016 ; Mundt et al, 2018 ; Bukten et al, 2020 ). However, the majority of interventions fail to produce long-term benefits and most prisoners return to use substances upon release ( Puljević et al, 2017 ). In this sense, it should be noted that while the observed current prevalence was considerably low compared to lifetime prevalence, SUD were still five times more frequent among prisoners who were ending their sentence than in the general Spanish population ( Navarro-Mateu et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a considerable body of evidence suggests that imprisonment may represent a unique opportunity to identify individuals with a history of substance use and initiate addiction treatments that significantly improve their health ( Degenhardt et al, 2014 ; de Andrade and Kinner, 2016 ; Mundt et al, 2018 ; Bukten et al, 2020 ). However, the majority of interventions fail to produce long-term benefits and most prisoners return to use substances upon release ( Puljević et al, 2017 ). In this sense, it should be noted that while the observed current prevalence was considerably low compared to lifetime prevalence, SUD were still five times more frequent among prisoners who were ending their sentence than in the general Spanish population ( Navarro-Mateu et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally in the Australian setting, while NRT is subsidised, research shows that it is not often utilised in the period following release from prison. This indicates a need for better promotion of the resources available to remain abstinent [83].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%