2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics 2009
DOI: 10.1109/robio.2009.4913060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending task analysis in HTA to model man-machine collaboration in cell production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detective modules for hand posture and task and task monitoring modules are marked in purple, while the tasks marked in green represent the robotic screw arm and automatic screw search modules. We determine the task process in reference to HTA [14][15][16]. The stages are explained as follows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detective modules for hand posture and task and task monitoring modules are marked in purple, while the tasks marked in green represent the robotic screw arm and automatic screw search modules. We determine the task process in reference to HTA [14][15][16]. The stages are explained as follows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The task scheduling of the workflow is generally modeled as a non-extended system in HTA [14] and an extended system in HTA [15], and as a safety-based system in HTA [16]. To further monitor hands, objects, and robot arms in these HTA, it is difficult for the researchers and practicians to propose a control scheme to fully manage kinds of hybrid automation assembly.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. General operation flow of the cable harness assembly Referring to HTA development guideline by Stanton (Stanton, 2006), the entire cable harness assembly is being decomposed into hierarchical task tree (Tan et al, 2008a). The overall operation objective is set as the main goal followed by general tasks in the assembly plan level as the sub goals.…”
Section: Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Please refer to table of hazard severity/exposure/avoidance categories, table of risk reduction decision matrix prior to safeguard, table of safeguard selection matrix, and table of safeguard selection validation matrix in ANSI/RIA R15.06) The assessment is done following three fundamental steps, which are identification, measurement and analysis of risk [15]. The initial risk identification (before implementation of safety design) is done from the task modeling of the assembly operation [16], [17]. The identified risk is then being measured by the hazard severity, exposure and avoidance categories to determine the risk reduction category.…”
Section: Collaboration Safety Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%