2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-985x.2005.00391.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending the Box–Cox Transformation to the Linear Mixed Model

Abstract: For a univariate linear model, the Box-Cox method helps to choose a response transformation to ensure the validity of a Gaussian distribution and related assumptions. The desire to extend the method to a linear mixed model raises many vexing questions. Most importantly, how do the distributions of the "two" sources of randomness (pure error and random effects) interact in determining the validity of assumptions? For an otherwise valid model, we prove that the success of a transformation may be judged solely in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
111
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
111
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Box-Cox test (Box & Cox, 1964; using the function "boxcox" in the package "MASS" in R, Venables & Ripley, 2002) indicated that the reciprocal transformation of the latencies was the most appropriate transformation for the data to reduce skewness and approximate a normal distribution. The Box-Cox test is commonly used in linear mixed-effect modeling to find the most appropriate transformation function that produce normally distributed residuals (Gurka et al, 2006;Gurka et al, 2007; see also Baayen & Milin, 2010). Instead of the suggested simple reciprocal transformation (i.e., 1/RT), we used -1000/RT to facilitate the reading and interpretation of our results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Box-Cox test (Box & Cox, 1964; using the function "boxcox" in the package "MASS" in R, Venables & Ripley, 2002) indicated that the reciprocal transformation of the latencies was the most appropriate transformation for the data to reduce skewness and approximate a normal distribution. The Box-Cox test is commonly used in linear mixed-effect modeling to find the most appropriate transformation function that produce normally distributed residuals (Gurka et al, 2006;Gurka et al, 2007; see also Baayen & Milin, 2010). Instead of the suggested simple reciprocal transformation (i.e., 1/RT), we used -1000/RT to facilitate the reading and interpretation of our results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the use of maximum likelihood estimation methods in mixed linear modelling assumes that the dependent variable is normal, the distributions of all variables were reviewed. Box-Cox transformations were applied to energy and all nutrient variables to ensure that they approximated normal distributions (51) , and mixed linear models were run using the Residual Maximum Likelihood estimation method (REML). Although the servings of vegetables and fruits in meals appeared normal without transformation, the distributions of servings from the other food groups were skewed and could not be transformed to approximate normality.…”
Section: Effect Of Food Donationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the scaling parameter was driven by the need to make the output data as normally distributed and homoscedastic as possible. In order to ensure this, we adopted a REML-based approach devised by Gurka et al (2006). However, applying the inverse transformation to the transformed model results in biased estimates of the mean, but not the median, on the original scale (Duan, 1983), so we present medians in subsequent analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%