2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2015.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending the cluster scaling technique to ruthenium clusters with hcp structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure b shows the mean Pt–Pt distance ⟨ d Pt–Pt ⟩ as a function of particle size compared to the bulk distance (2.77 Å). We find that ⟨ d Pt–Pt ⟩ scales linearly when plotted against the number of Pt atoms to the power of −1/3, N Pt –1/3 , as has been shown previously for Pt and other transition metals. The scaling is best for particles exhibiting the cuboctahedral shape (black dots) with the exception of the smallest Pt 13 cluster, which we attribute to quantum size effects. The chemical potential, which we approximate as the average energy per atom, , is shown as a function of N Pt –1/3 in Figure c, and we observe a linear trend for all three particle shapes investigated here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure b shows the mean Pt–Pt distance ⟨ d Pt–Pt ⟩ as a function of particle size compared to the bulk distance (2.77 Å). We find that ⟨ d Pt–Pt ⟩ scales linearly when plotted against the number of Pt atoms to the power of −1/3, N Pt –1/3 , as has been shown previously for Pt and other transition metals. The scaling is best for particles exhibiting the cuboctahedral shape (black dots) with the exception of the smallest Pt 13 cluster, which we attribute to quantum size effects. The chemical potential, which we approximate as the average energy per atom, , is shown as a function of N Pt –1/3 in Figure c, and we observe a linear trend for all three particle shapes investigated here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…As already mentioned, the trends described in Figure are not unique to Pt but have also been observed for other transition metals, for example, Pd, , Ru, and Au, but also main group metals like Al or alkaline earth metals like Mg. , With this in mind we investigated transition metals of groups 8, 9, 10, and 11 as well as Mg and Al. All metals were investigated in the fcc structure, although we note that Ru, Os, Co, and Mg crystallize in the hcp structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…For Cu, the effect of geometry optimization is studied explicitly. For free standing metal Cu clusters ranging from 13 to 923 atoms, a linear relation between the mean Cu-Cu distance, the chemical potential which is approximated by the average energy per atom, and the number of atoms to the power of -1/3 (see Figure S3) is observed, similarly to what has been found for other metals [13,34,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. Figure 1 shows the adsorption energy of an oxygen atom on the Cu clusters with increasing size.…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
“…The calculated results of Ru clusters up to 64 atoms indicate that the simple cubic is the most stable structure for clusters up to 40 atoms, 36 while the icosahedral structure is the most stable for more than 40 atoms. The scaling behaviors for hcp and fcc Ru-NPs between 55 and 323 atomic systems were also established by Soini et al 37 The cohesive energies of hcp Ru-NPs were always higher than those of fcc Ru-NPs. In this analysis, only two samples were treated as the icosahedral structure.…”
Section: ■ Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The specified truncation length results in lower cohesive energy. In ref , hcp Ru-NPs consisting of 57 and 153 atoms (Figures S9­(a) and (b)) were considered. The cohesive energies of the hcp Ru 57 and Ru 153 were lower than the regression line obtained from the cohesive energies of the icosahedral fcc Ru-NPs (Figure S9­(c)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%