2015
DOI: 10.1108/ijmce-08-2014-0032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending the mentor role in initial teacher education: embracing social justice

Abstract: Purpose -The paper explores how mentors can act as change agents for social justice. It examines mentors' roles in initial teacher education in the lifelong learning sector (LLS) and how critical spaces can be opened up to promote a flow of mentor, trainee teacher, learner and community empowerment.Design/methodology/approach -Two thematic literature reviews were undertaken: one of UK LLS ITE mentoring and the other an international review of social justice in relation to mentoring in ITE and the first year… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hobson and Malderez (2013) also referred to clarity of role, stating that schoolassigned mentors have two conflicting roles -assessing and supporting -thus leading to judgementoring. This phenomenon has been reported in several studies, attributed to the uncertainty about mentoring purposes and roles (Duckworth and Maxwell, 2015). Hobson and Malderez (2013) argued that one of the main causes of judgementoring is the requirement for mentors to also act as assessors and gatekeepers to the profession, especially in the absence of appropriate provision of mentor development opportunities in preparation for fulfilling both roles and for doing so without compromising the other.…”
Section: Meso Level Factorsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Hobson and Malderez (2013) also referred to clarity of role, stating that schoolassigned mentors have two conflicting roles -assessing and supporting -thus leading to judgementoring. This phenomenon has been reported in several studies, attributed to the uncertainty about mentoring purposes and roles (Duckworth and Maxwell, 2015). Hobson and Malderez (2013) argued that one of the main causes of judgementoring is the requirement for mentors to also act as assessors and gatekeepers to the profession, especially in the absence of appropriate provision of mentor development opportunities in preparation for fulfilling both roles and for doing so without compromising the other.…”
Section: Meso Level Factorsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Secondly, Duckworth and Maxwell (2015) state that their review of literature on mentoring in teacher training programmes in the FE sector in England "demonstrates the prevalence of a "judgementoring" approach" (p. 17). This conclusion is supported by the findings of Project 3, in which the following viewpoint expressed by a beginner teacher who had worked with a number of mentors was not uncommon:…”
Section: The Nature and Reach Of Judgementoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In such a scenario, beginning and more experienced teachers will naturally associate mentoring with evaluations of and judgements on their teaching. Furthermore, such a scenario encourages a stigma to be attached to being mentored, which is likely to exacerbate the tendency toward fabrication as strategic silence and strategic avoidance, as the following excerpt from an interview with an FE college's head of professional With regard to the English FE sector, Duckworth and Maxwell (2015) conclude that policy reforms (DfES, 2004) have imposed a model of mentoring that emphasises subject support and the assessment of teaching competence … and has led to judgemental rather than developmental approaches to mentoring … aligning with Hobson and Malderez's (2013) conceptualisation of "judgementoring" in the schools sector. (Duckworth and Maxwell, 2015, p. 8) On the other hand, and less directly, the involvement of mentors and others in routine formal evaluation of the work of beginning teachers (and teachers in general) in England has been encouraged by the government's role in embracing the 'Global Educational Reform Movement' (GERM) (Sahlberg, 2010) and what Ball (2003) Notwithstanding other likely contributory factors, such as the failure of many schools and colleges to employ sufficiently rigorous methods of mentor selection (based on appropriate selection criteria such as potential to provide non-judgemental support), the fourth major cause of the widespread enactment of judgementoring is the frequent absence (well-established in the mentoring literature) of appropriate provision for mentor education and training.…”
Section: Causes Of Judgementoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alongside other collaborative work, our developing relationship usually involves counter-storytelling where we establish our common bonds, points of difference and enter the third spaces. In the type of co-mentoring we are proposing in this paper, we each bring to the table, our own "pedagogical capital" (Duckworth and Maxwell, 2015). Since social change and personal transformation are .…”
Section: The Co-production Of Knowledge Through Relationship: Implicamentioning
confidence: 99%